Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population

被引:156
|
作者
Jarquin, Diego [1 ]
Kocak, Kyle [1 ]
Posadas, Luis [1 ]
Hyma, Katie [2 ]
Jedlicka, Joseph [1 ]
Graef, George [1 ]
Lorenz, Aaron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Inst Genom Div, Ithaca, NY USA
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; BLIGHT RESISTANCE; GENETIC VALUES; SELECTION; YIELD; PLANT; MAIZE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-15-740
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Advances in genotyping technology, such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS), are making genomic prediction more attractive to reduce breeding cycle times and costs associated with phenotyping. Genomic prediction and selection has been studied in several crop species, but no reports exist in soybean. The objectives of this study were (i) evaluate prospects for genomic selection using GBS in a typical soybean breeding program and (ii) evaluate the effect of GBS marker selection and imputation on genomic prediction accuracy. To achieve these objectives, a set of soybean lines sampled from the University of Nebraska Soybean Breeding Program were genotyped using GBS and evaluated for yield and other agronomic traits at multiple Nebraska locations. Results: Genotyping by sequencing scored 16,502 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with minor-allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 and percentage of missing values <= 5% on 301 elite soybean breeding lines. When SNPs with up to 80% missing values were included, 52,349 SNPs were scored. Prediction accuracy for grain yield, assessed using cross validation, was estimated to be 0.64, indicating good potential for using genomic selection for grain yield in soybean. Filtering SNPs based on missing data percentage had little to no effect on prediction accuracy, especially when random forest imputation was used to impute missing values. The highest accuracies were observed when random forest imputation was used on all SNPs, but differences were not significant. A standard additive G-BLUP model was robust; modeling additive-by-additive epistasis did not provide any improvement in prediction accuracy. The effect of training population size on accuracy began to plateau around 100, but accuracy steadily climbed until the largest possible size was used in this analysis. Including only SNPs with MAF > 0.30 provided higher accuracies when training populations were smaller. Conclusions: Using GBS for genomic prediction in soybean holds good potential to expedite genetic gain. Our results suggest that standard additive G-BLUP models can be used on unfiltered, imputed GBS data without loss in accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Across-population genomic prediction in grapevine opens up promising prospects for breeding
    Brault, Charlotte
    Segura, Vincent
    This, Patrice
    Le Cunff, Loic
    Flutre, Timothee
    Francois, Pierre
    Pons, Thierry
    Peros, Jean-Pierre
    Doligez, Agnes
    HORTICULTURE RESEARCH, 2022, 9
  • [42] Genomic Prediction of Biomass Yield in Two Selection Cycles of a Tetraploid Alfalfa Breeding Population
    Li, Xuehui
    Wei, Yanling
    Acharya, Ananta
    Hansen, Julie L.
    Crawford, Jamie L.
    Viands, Donald R.
    Michaud, Real
    Claessens, Annie
    Brummer, E. Charles
    PLANT GENOME, 2015, 8 (02):
  • [43] Applications of Population Genetics to Animal Breeding, from Wright, Fisher and Lush to Genomic Prediction
    Hill, William G.
    GENETICS, 2014, 196 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [44] Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations
    Gregor Gorjanc
    Matthew A Cleveland
    Ross D Houston
    John M Hickey
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 47
  • [45] Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    Cleveland, Matthew A.
    Houston, Ross D.
    Hickey, John M.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2015, 47
  • [46] Genotyping-by-sequencing and genomic selection applications in hexaploid triticale
    Ayalew, Habtamu
    Anderson, Joshua D.
    Krom, Nick
    Tang, Yuhong
    Butler, Twain J.
    Rawat, Nidhi
    Tiwari, Vijay
    Ma, Xue-Feng
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [47] Genotyping by multiplexed sequencing (GMS): A customizable platform for genomic selection
    Ruff, Travis M.
    Marston, Elliott J.
    Eagle, Jonathan D.
    Sthapit, Sajal R.
    Hooker, Marcus A.
    Skinner, Daniel Z.
    See, Deven R.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [48] Genomic Prediction of Resistance to Tar Spot Complex of Maize in Multiple Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing SNPs
    Cao, Shiliang
    Song, Junqiao
    Yuan, Yibing
    Zhang, Ao
    Ren, Jiaojiao
    Liu, Yubo
    Qu, Jingtao
    Hu, Guanghui
    Zhang, Jianguo
    Wang, Chunping
    Cao, Jingsheng
    Olsen, Michael
    Prasanna, Boddupalli M.
    San Vicente, Felix
    Zhang, Xuecai
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [49] Comparison of sequencing-based and array-based genotyping platforms for genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance
    Yu, Guangning
    Cui, Yanru
    Jiao, Yuxin
    Zhou, Kai
    Wang, Xin
    Yang, Wenyan
    Xu, Yiyi
    Yang, Kun
    Zhang, Xuecai
    Li, Pengcheng
    Yang, Zefeng
    Xu, Yang
    Xu, Chenwu
    CROP JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (02): : 490 - 498
  • [50] Impact of Genomic Prediction Model, Selection Intensity, and Breeding Strategy on the Long-Term Genetic Gain and Genetic Erosion in Soybean Breeding
    Borges da Silva, Eder David
    Xavier, Alencar
    Faria, Marcos Ventura
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12