Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population

被引:156
|
作者
Jarquin, Diego [1 ]
Kocak, Kyle [1 ]
Posadas, Luis [1 ]
Hyma, Katie [2 ]
Jedlicka, Joseph [1 ]
Graef, George [1 ]
Lorenz, Aaron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Inst Genom Div, Ithaca, NY USA
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; BLIGHT RESISTANCE; GENETIC VALUES; SELECTION; YIELD; PLANT; MAIZE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-15-740
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Advances in genotyping technology, such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS), are making genomic prediction more attractive to reduce breeding cycle times and costs associated with phenotyping. Genomic prediction and selection has been studied in several crop species, but no reports exist in soybean. The objectives of this study were (i) evaluate prospects for genomic selection using GBS in a typical soybean breeding program and (ii) evaluate the effect of GBS marker selection and imputation on genomic prediction accuracy. To achieve these objectives, a set of soybean lines sampled from the University of Nebraska Soybean Breeding Program were genotyped using GBS and evaluated for yield and other agronomic traits at multiple Nebraska locations. Results: Genotyping by sequencing scored 16,502 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with minor-allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 and percentage of missing values <= 5% on 301 elite soybean breeding lines. When SNPs with up to 80% missing values were included, 52,349 SNPs were scored. Prediction accuracy for grain yield, assessed using cross validation, was estimated to be 0.64, indicating good potential for using genomic selection for grain yield in soybean. Filtering SNPs based on missing data percentage had little to no effect on prediction accuracy, especially when random forest imputation was used to impute missing values. The highest accuracies were observed when random forest imputation was used on all SNPs, but differences were not significant. A standard additive G-BLUP model was robust; modeling additive-by-additive epistasis did not provide any improvement in prediction accuracy. The effect of training population size on accuracy began to plateau around 100, but accuracy steadily climbed until the largest possible size was used in this analysis. Including only SNPs with MAF > 0.30 provided higher accuracies when training populations were smaller. Conclusions: Using GBS for genomic prediction in soybean holds good potential to expedite genetic gain. Our results suggest that standard additive G-BLUP models can be used on unfiltered, imputed GBS data without loss in accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genomic prediction in a multi-generation Eucalyptus globulus breeding population
    Haristoy, Geoffrey
    Bouffier, Laurent
    Fontes, Luis
    Leal, Luis
    Paiva, Jorge A. P.
    Pina, Joao-Pedro
    Gion, Jean-Marc
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [22] SoyDNGP: a web-accessible deep learning framework for genomic prediction in soybean breeding
    Gao, Pengfei
    Zhao, Haonan
    Luo, Zheng
    Lin, Yifan
    Feng, Wanjie
    Li, Yaling
    Kong, Fanjiang
    Li, Xia
    Fang, Chao
    Wang, Xutong
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 24 (06)
  • [23] Genomic prediction using training population design in interspecific soybean populations
    Beche, Eduardo
    Gillman, Jason D.
    Song, Qijian
    Nelson, Randall
    Beissinger, Tim
    Decker, Jared
    Shannon, Grover
    Scaboo, Andrew M.
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2021, 41 (02)
  • [24] Genomic prediction using training population design in interspecific soybean populations
    Eduardo Beche
    Jason D. Gillman
    Qijian Song
    Randall Nelson
    Tim Beissinger
    Jared Decker
    Grover Shannon
    Andrew M. Scaboo
    Molecular Breeding, 2021, 41
  • [25] Genomic prediction of starch content and chipping quality in tetraploid potato using genotyping-by-sequencing
    Sverrisdottir, Elsa
    Byrne, Stephen
    Sundmark, Ea Hoegh Riis
    Johnsen, Heidi Ollegaard
    Kirk, Hanne Grethe
    Asp, Torben
    Janss, Luc
    Nielsen, Kare L.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2017, 130 (10) : 2091 - 2108
  • [26] Genomic prediction of starch content and chipping quality in tetraploid potato using genotyping-by-sequencing
    Elsa Sverrisdóttir
    Stephen Byrne
    Ea Høegh Riis Sundmark
    Heidi Øllegaard Johnsen
    Hanne Grethe Kirk
    Torben Asp
    Luc Janss
    Kåre L. Nielsen
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2017, 130 : 2091 - 2108
  • [27] Genetic and Genomic Resources for Soybean Breeding Research
    Petereit, Jakob
    Marsh, Jacob, I
    Bayer, Philipp E.
    Danilevicz, Monica F.
    Thomas, William J. W.
    Batley, Jacqueline
    Edwards, David
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [28] Evaluation of Genomic Selection Training Population Designs and Genotyping Strategies in Plant Breeding Programs Using Simulation
    Hickey, John M.
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Crossa, Jose
    Hearne, Sarah
    Babu, Raman
    Prasanna, Boddupalli M.
    Grondona, Martin
    Zambelli, Andres
    Windhausen, Vanessa S.
    Mathews, Ky
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    CROP SCIENCE, 2014, 54 (04) : 1476 - 1488
  • [29] Breeding Science Special Issue: Soybean breeding in genomic era Foreword
    Ishimoto, Masao
    Harada, Kyuya
    BREEDING SCIENCE, 2011, 61 (05) : 435 - 435
  • [30] On the prediction of genomic breeding value and selection in animal breeding
    Matsuda, Hirokazu
    Iwaisaki, Hiroaki
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 86 (06) : 393 - 393