Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Jones, Rob J. [2 ,3 ]
Paul, Jim [2 ]
Birrell, Fiona [4 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [1 ]
Leung, Hing Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Beatson West Scotland Canc Ctr, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Inst Canc Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
radiation recurrent prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate disease < UROLOGY; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; CRYOABLATION; CRYOSURGERY; FAILURE; TRIALS; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). Design Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. Setting and methods Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. Results SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of 29719 (Euro37619) (95% CI -51985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of 30000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. Conclusions The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Levy, Joseph F.
    Khairnar, Rahul
    Louie, Alexander, V
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Mishra, Mark, V
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 (02) : E172 - E179
  • [32] Cost-Effectiveness of Prostate Radiation Therapy in Men with Newly Diagnosed Low Burden Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Lester-Coll, N. H.
    Ades, S.
    Yu, J. B.
    Atherly, A.
    Wallace, H. J.
    Sprague, B. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : S180 - S181
  • [33] Using decision analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Konski, Andre
    Watkins-Bruner, Deborah
    Feigenberg, Steven
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Kulkarni, Sachin
    Beck, J. Robert
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Pollack, Alan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (02): : 408 - 415
  • [34] Androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a focus on pharmacokinetics
    Polotti, Charles F.
    Kim, Christopher J.
    Chuchvara, Nadiya
    Polotti, Alyssa B.
    Singer, Eric A.
    Elsamra, Sammy
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 13 (12) : 1265 - 1273
  • [35] A decision support model for cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer
    Lyth, Johan
    Andersson, Swen-Olof
    Andren, Ove
    Johansson, Jan-Erik
    Carlsson, Per
    Shahsavar, Nosrat
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 46 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [36] Metabolomic effects of androgen deprivation therapy treatment for prostate cancer
    Chi, Jen-Tsan
    Lin, Pao-Hwa
    Tolstikov, Vladimir
    Oyekunle, Taofik
    Chen, Emily Y.
    Bussberg, Valerie
    Greenwood, Bennett
    Sarangarajan, Rangaprasad
    Narain, Niven R.
    Kiebish, Michael A.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (11): : 3691 - 3702
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone, docetaxel or placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer
    Aguiar Jr, Pedro Nazareth
    San Tan, Pui
    Simko, Sarah
    Noia Barreto, Carmelia Maria
    Gutierres, Barbara de Souza
    del Giglio, Auro
    Lopes Jr, Gilberto de Lima
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2019, 17 (02): : eGS4414
  • [38] Analysis of mathematical model of prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy
    Zazoua, Assia
    Wang, Wendi
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2019, 66 : 41 - 60
  • [39] Androgen and prostate cancer: the role of primary androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer
    Namiki, Mikio
    Kitagawa, Yasuhide
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    Koh, Eitetsu
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2008, 5 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [40] Androgen deprivation and radiation therapy in prostate cancer: The evolving case for combination therapy
    Zietman, AL
    Shipley, WU
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02): : 245 - 246