Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Jones, Rob J. [2 ,3 ]
Paul, Jim [2 ]
Birrell, Fiona [4 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [1 ]
Leung, Hing Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Beatson West Scotland Canc Ctr, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Inst Canc Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
radiation recurrent prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate disease < UROLOGY; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; CRYOABLATION; CRYOSURGERY; FAILURE; TRIALS; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). Design Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. Setting and methods Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. Results SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of 29719 (Euro37619) (95% CI -51985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of 30000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. Conclusions The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 1 - 30
  • [22] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Das, Manjulika
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (10): : E567 - E567
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of androgen suppression strategies in advanced prostate cancer
    Bayoumi, AM
    Brown, AS
    Garber, AM
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 458 - 458
  • [24] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Sharifi, N
    Gulley, JL
    Dahut, WL
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (02): : 238 - 244
  • [25] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Bahnson, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04): : 1148 - 1148
  • [26] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Singer, Eric A.
    Golijanin, Dragan J.
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    Messing, Edward M.
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 9 (02) : 211 - 228
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of androgen suppression therapies in advanced prostate cancer
    Bayoumi, AM
    Brown, AD
    Garber, AM
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (21): : 1731 - 1739
  • [28] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF OLIGOMETASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER: DEFFERING ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY
    Beltramo, Giancarlo
    Matei, Victor
    Bergantin, Achille
    Martinotti, Anna Stefania
    Vite, Cristina
    Ria, Francesco
    Invernizzi, Marta
    Bianchi, Livia Corinna
    Locatelli, Cristina
    Longo, Giovanni
    Maggioni, Matteo
    Dormia, Guido
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (05) : 2628 - 2628
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide versus apalutamide versus androgen deprivation therapy alone for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada
    Saad, Fred
    Chilelli, Andrew
    Hui, Benny
    Muratov, Sergey
    Ganguli, Arijit
    North, Scott
    Shayegan, Bobby
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 583 - 590
  • [30] Androgen deprivation treatment in prostate cancer
    Thomas, Benjamin C.
    Neal, David E.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346