Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures

被引:488
|
作者
Sheetz, Kyle H. [1 ,2 ]
Claflin, Jake [3 ]
Dimick, Justin B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Rd,NCRC Bldg 16,Room 100N-11, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
DIFFUSION; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This cohort study characterizes trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Key PointsQuestionGiven concerns that robotic surgery is increasing for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit, how is the use of robotic surgery changing over time? FindingsIn this cohort study of 169404 patients in 73 hospitals, the use of robotic surgery for all general surgery procedures increased from 1.8% to 15.1% from 2012 to 2018. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. MeaningThese findings highlight a need to continually monitor the adoption of robotic surgery to ensure that enthusiasm for new technology does not outpace the evidence needed to use it in the most effective clinical contexts. ImportanceIncreasing use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit is raising concern. Analyses of population-based trends in practice and how hospitals' acquisition of robotic surgical technologies is associated with their use are limited. ObjectiveTo characterize trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used clinical registry data from Michigan from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018. Trends were characterized in the use of robotic surgery for common procedures for which traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery was already considered a safe and effective approach for most surgeons when clinically feasible. A multigroup interrupted time series analysis was performed to determine how procedural approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) change after hospitals launch a robotic surgery program. Data were analyzed from March 1 through April 19, 2019. ExposuresInitiation of robotic surgery. Main Outcomes and MeasuresProcedure approach (ie, robotic, open, or laparoscopic). ResultsThe study cohort included 169404 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [16.9] years; 90595 women [53.5%]) at 73 hospitals. The use of robotic surgery increased from 1.8% in 2012 to 15.1% in 2018 (8.4-fold increase; slope, 2.1% per year; 95% CI, 1.9%-2.3%). For certain procedures, the magnitude of the increase was greater; for example, for inguinal hernia repair, the use of robotic surgery increased from 0.7% to 28.8% (41.1-fold change; slope, 5.4% per year; 95% CI, 5.1%-5.7%). The use of robotic surgery increased 8.8% in the first 4 years after hospitals began performing robotic surgery (2.8% per year; 95% CI, 2.7%-2.9%). This trend was associated with a decrease in laparoscopic surgery from 53.2% to 51.3% (difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -2.2% to -1.6%). Before adopting robotic surgery, hospitals' use of laparoscopic surgery increased 1.3% per year. After adopting robotic surgery, the use of laparoscopic surgery declined 0.3% (difference in trends, -1.6%; 95% CI, -1.7% to -1.5%). Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that robotic surgery has continued to diffuse across a broad range of common surgical procedures. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Overview of Common Surgical Procedures in CHD
    Shmukler, Anna
    Haramati, Adina
    Haramati, Linda B.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 55 (03) : 264 - 278
  • [42] Trends in common surgical procedures at children's and nonchildren's hospitals between 2000 and 2009
    Short, Heather L.
    Sarda, Samir
    Travers, Curtis
    Hockenberry, Jason M.
    McCarthy, Ian
    Raval, Mehul, V
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (08) : 1472 - 1477
  • [43] Surgery - Adoption of new surgical technology
    Wilson, CB
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7533): : 112 - 114
  • [44] Recent Trends in Automating Robotic Surgery
    Elek, Renata
    Nagy, Tamas Daniel
    Nagy, Denes Akos
    Kronreif, Gernot
    Rudas, Imre J.
    Haidegger, Tamas
    INES 2016 20TH JUBILEE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2016, : 27 - 32
  • [45] National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery
    Richard S. Hoehn
    Ibrahim Nassour
    Mohamed A. Adam
    Sharon Winters
    Alessandro Paniccia
    Amer H. Zureikat
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 983 - 990
  • [46] Current Trends and Perspectives in Robotic Surgery
    Andolfi, Ciro
    Umanskiy, Konstantin
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (02): : 127 - 128
  • [47] National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery
    Hoehn, Richard S.
    Nassour, Ibrahim
    Adam, Mohamed A.
    Winters, Sharon
    Paniccia, Alessandro
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (04) : 983 - 990
  • [48] Current Trends in Robotic Surgery for Otolaryngology
    Byrd J.K.
    Duvvuri U.
    Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, 2013, 1 (3) : 153 - 157
  • [49] Temporal and institutional trends in robotic surgery
    Pordal, A.
    Guerra, J. D.
    Morin, D.
    Oppat, W.
    Jacobs, M. J.
    Patil, S.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [50] Adoption of transoral robotic surgery compared with other surgical modalities for treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Cracchiolo, Jennifer R.
    Roman, Benjamin R.
    Kutler, David I.
    Kuhel, William I.
    Cohen, Marc A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 114 (04) : 405 - 411