Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures

被引:488
|
作者
Sheetz, Kyle H. [1 ,2 ]
Claflin, Jake [3 ]
Dimick, Justin B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Rd,NCRC Bldg 16,Room 100N-11, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
DIFFUSION; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This cohort study characterizes trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Key PointsQuestionGiven concerns that robotic surgery is increasing for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit, how is the use of robotic surgery changing over time? FindingsIn this cohort study of 169404 patients in 73 hospitals, the use of robotic surgery for all general surgery procedures increased from 1.8% to 15.1% from 2012 to 2018. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. MeaningThese findings highlight a need to continually monitor the adoption of robotic surgery to ensure that enthusiasm for new technology does not outpace the evidence needed to use it in the most effective clinical contexts. ImportanceIncreasing use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit is raising concern. Analyses of population-based trends in practice and how hospitals' acquisition of robotic surgical technologies is associated with their use are limited. ObjectiveTo characterize trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used clinical registry data from Michigan from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018. Trends were characterized in the use of robotic surgery for common procedures for which traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery was already considered a safe and effective approach for most surgeons when clinically feasible. A multigroup interrupted time series analysis was performed to determine how procedural approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) change after hospitals launch a robotic surgery program. Data were analyzed from March 1 through April 19, 2019. ExposuresInitiation of robotic surgery. Main Outcomes and MeasuresProcedure approach (ie, robotic, open, or laparoscopic). ResultsThe study cohort included 169404 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [16.9] years; 90595 women [53.5%]) at 73 hospitals. The use of robotic surgery increased from 1.8% in 2012 to 15.1% in 2018 (8.4-fold increase; slope, 2.1% per year; 95% CI, 1.9%-2.3%). For certain procedures, the magnitude of the increase was greater; for example, for inguinal hernia repair, the use of robotic surgery increased from 0.7% to 28.8% (41.1-fold change; slope, 5.4% per year; 95% CI, 5.1%-5.7%). The use of robotic surgery increased 8.8% in the first 4 years after hospitals began performing robotic surgery (2.8% per year; 95% CI, 2.7%-2.9%). This trend was associated with a decrease in laparoscopic surgery from 53.2% to 51.3% (difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -2.2% to -1.6%). Before adopting robotic surgery, hospitals' use of laparoscopic surgery increased 1.3% per year. After adopting robotic surgery, the use of laparoscopic surgery declined 0.3% (difference in trends, -1.6%; 95% CI, -1.7% to -1.5%). Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that robotic surgery has continued to diffuse across a broad range of common surgical procedures. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of robotic surgery for emergency procedures in general surgery
    Plum, Patrick Sven
    Mehdorn, Matthias
    Gockel, Ines
    CHIRURGIE, 2024, 95 (07): : 583 - 584
  • [32] Five Year Trends in the Utilization of Robotic Bariatric Surgery Procedures, United States 2015–2019
    Elisa Morales-Marroquin
    Shreeya Khatiwada
    Luyu Xie
    Nestor de la Cruz-Muñoz
    Sachin Kukreja
    Benjamin Schneider
    Faisal G. Qureshi
    Sarah E. Messiah
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 1539 - 1545
  • [33] Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
    Magis Mandapathil
    Jens E. Meyer
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 4021 - 4026
  • [34] Robotic Surgery: A Solution in Search of a Problem-A Bayesian Analysis of 343 Robotic Procedures Performed by a Single Surgical Team
    Manciu, Simona
    Dragomir, Mihnea
    Curea, Fabiana
    Vasilescu, Catalin
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (04): : 363 - 374
  • [35] Robotic and laparoscopic surgical procedures for colorectal cancer
    Alekberzade, Aftandil
    Borisov, Vitaliy
    Kirov, Kiril
    Mena, Natmir
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 375 - 381
  • [36] Robotic and laparoscopic surgical procedures for colorectal cancer
    Aftandil Alekberzade
    Vitaliy Borisov
    Kiril Kirov
    Natmir Mena
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 375 - 381
  • [37] Variation profiles of common surgical procedures
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Sharp, SM
    Finlayson, SRG
    Fisher, ES
    Wennberg, JE
    SURGERY, 1998, 124 (05) : 917 - 923
  • [38] Radiologic features of common surgical procedures
    Waddill, WB
    Hunter, TB
    Carlevato, NJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 682 - 682
  • [39] Roundtable - Common surgical procedures in rodents
    Campbell
    Suedmeyer
    Worell
    EXOTIC PET PRACTICE, 1999, 4 (08): : 59 - 60
  • [40] Common Surgical Procedures in Pet Rodents
    Capello, Vittorio
    JOURNAL OF EXOTIC PET MEDICINE, 2011, 20 (04) : 294 - 307