Cluster magnification and the mass-richness relation in CFHTLenS

被引:41
|
作者
Ford, Jes [1 ]
Hildebrandt, Hendrik [1 ,2 ]
Van Waerbeke, Ludovic [1 ]
Erben, Thomas [2 ]
Laigle, Clotilde [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Milkeraitis, Martha [1 ]
Morrison, Christopher B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys & Astron, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
[2] Argelander Inst Astron, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[3] Inst Astrophys Paris, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] UPMC, UMR 7095, F-75014 Paris, France
[5] Ecole Polytech, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: photometry; dark matter; LYMAN-BREAK GALAXIES; DARK-MATTER HALOS; LENSING MAGNIFICATION; PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS; COSMIC MAGNIFICATION; LUMINOSITY FUNCTION; QUASARS; Z=3-5; II;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stu225
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Gravitational lensing magnification is measured with a significance of 9.7 Sigma on a large sample of galaxy clusters in the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS). This survey covers similar to 154 deg(2) and contains over 18 000 cluster candidates at redshifts 0.2 < z < 0.9, detected using the 3D-Matched Filter cluster-finder of Milkeraitis et al. We fit composite-NFW models to the ensemble, accounting for cluster miscentring, source-lens redshift overlap, as well as nearby structure (the two-halo term), and recover mass estimates of the cluster dark matter haloes in range of similar to 10(13) M-circle dot to 2 x 10(14) M-circle dot. Cluster richness is measured for the entire sample, and we bin the clusters according to both richness and redshift. A mass-richness relation M-200 = M-0(N-200/20)(beta) is fit to the measurements. For two different cluster miscentring models, we find consistent results for the normalization and slope, M-0 = (2.3 +/- 0.2) x 10(13) M-circle dot, beta = 1.4 +/- 0.1 and M-0 = (2.2 +/- 0.2) x 10(13) M-circle dot, beta = 1.5 +/- 0.1. We find that accounting for the full redshift distribution of lenses and sources is important, since any overlap can have an impact on mass estimates inferred from flux magnification.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3755 / 3764
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mass calibration of the CODEX cluster sample using SPIDERS spectroscopy - I. The richness-mass relation
    Capasso, R.
    Mohr, J. J.
    Saro, A.
    Biviano, A.
    Clerc, N.
    Finoguenov, A.
    Grandis, S.
    Collins, C.
    Erfanianfar, G.
    Damsted, S.
    Kirkpatrick, C.
    Kukkola, A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 486 (02) : 1594 - 1607
  • [22] Weak-lensing-inferred scaling relations of galaxy clusters in the RCS2: mass-richness, mass-concentration, mass-bias, and more
    van Uitert, Edo
    Gilbank, David G.
    Hoekstra, Henk
    Semboloni, Elisabetta
    Gladders, Michael D.
    Yee, Howard K. C.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2016, 586
  • [23] The richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters from weak-lensing magnification in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey
    Chiu, I. -Non
    Umetsu, Keiichi
    Murata, Ryoma
    Medezinski, Elinor
    Oguri, Masamune
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 495 (01) : 428 - 450
  • [24] Cluster richness–mass calibration with cosmic microwave background lensing
    James E. Geach
    John A. Peacock
    Nature Astronomy, 2017, 1 : 795 - 799
  • [25] CFHTLenS: Galaxy bias as function of scale, stellar mass, and colour
    Simon, Patrick
    Hilbert, Stefan
    Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2021, 646
  • [26] Mass-Richness Relations for X-Ray and SZE-selected Clusters at 0.4 < z < 2.0 as Seen by Spitzer at 4.5 μm
    Rettura, A.
    Chary, R.
    Krick, J.
    Ettori, S.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 867 (01):
  • [27] The insignificant evolution of the richness-mass relation of galaxy clusters
    Andreon, S.
    Congdon, P.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2014, 568
  • [28] Mass calibration of the CODEX cluster sample using SPIDERS spectroscopy - I. The richness-mass relation (vol 486, pg 1594, 2019)
    Capasso, R.
    Mohr, J. J.
    Saro, A.
    Biviano, A.
    Clerc, N.
    Finoguenov, A.
    Grandis, S.
    Collins, C.
    Erfanianfar, G.
    Damsted, S.
    Kirkpatrick, C.
    Kukkola, A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 488 (01) : 481 - 481
  • [29] Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing: Shear versus magnification information
    King, L
    Schneider, P
    Erben, T
    GRAVITATIONAL LENSING: RECENT PROGRESS AND FUTURE GOALS, 2001, 237 : 321 - 322
  • [30] Cluster mass profile reconstruction with size and flux magnification on the HST STAGES survey
    Duncan, Christopher A. J.
    Heymans, Catherine
    Heavens, Alan F.
    Joachimi, Benjamin
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 457 (01) : 764 - 785