Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research

被引:189
|
作者
Yoon, Dustin Y. [1 ]
Mansukhani, Neel A. [1 ]
Stubbs, Vanessa C. [1 ]
Helenowski, Irene B. [2 ]
Woodruff, Teresa K. [3 ,4 ]
Kibbe, Melina R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Womens Hlth Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WOMENS HEALTH; PREVENTION; ASPIRIN; CELL; NIH;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although the Revitalization Act was passed in 1993 to increase enrollment of women in clinical trials, there has been little focus on sex disparity in basic and translational research. We hypothesize that sex bias exists in surgical biomedical research. Methods. Manuscripts from Annals of Surgery, American Journal of Surgery, JAMA Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, and Surgery from 2011 to 2012 were reviewed. Data abstracted included study type, sex of the animal or cell studied, location, and presence of sex-based reporting of data. Results. Of 2,347 articles reviewed, 618 included animals and/or cells. For animal research, 22% of the publications did not specify the sex of the animals. Of the reports that did specify the sex, 80% of publications included only males, 17% only females, and 3% both sexes. A greater disparity existed in the number of animals studied: 16,152 (84%) male and 3,173 (16%) female (P < .0001). For cell research, 76% of the publications did not specify the sex. Of the papers that did specify the sex, 71% of publications included only males, 21% only females, and 7% both sexes. Only 7 (1 %) studies reported sex-based results. For publications on female-prevalent diseases, 44% did not report the sex studied. Of those reports that specified the sex, only 12% studied female animals. More international than national (ie, United States) publications studied only males (85% vs 71%, P = .004), whereas more national publications did not specify the sex (47% vs 20%, P < .0001). A subanalysis of a single journal showed that across three decades, the number of male-only studies and usage of male animals has become more disparate over time. Conclusion. Sex bias, be it overt, inadvertent, situational, financial, or ignorant, exists in surgical biomedical research. Because biomedical research serves as the foundation for subsequent clinical research and medical decision-making, it is imperative that this disparity be addressed because conclusions derived from such studies may be specific to only one sex.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 516
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Art and Science of Communication in JACC: Basic to Translational Science
    Mann, Douglas L.
    JACC-BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2025, 10 (02): : 242 - 246
  • [42] Unmasking the Adverse Impacts of Sex Bias on Science and Research Animal Welfare
    Nunamaker, Elizabeth A.
    Turner, Patricia V.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (17):
  • [43] Sex bias in basic and preclinical age-related hearing loss research
    Dillan F. Villavisanis
    Katrina M. Schrode
    Amanda M. Lauer
    Biology of Sex Differences, 9
  • [44] Sex bias in basic and preclinical age-related hearing loss research
    Villavisanis, Dillan F.
    Schrode, Katrina M.
    Lauer, Amanda M.
    BIOLOGY OF SEX DIFFERENCES, 2018, 9
  • [45] Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
    Lauer, Amanda Marie
    Schrode, Katrina Marie
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2017, 19 (90): : 207 - 212
  • [46] Guiding Preclinical Medical Students in Finding, Synthesizing, and Communicating Translational Basic Research Literature: Roles for Basic Science Research Mentors
    Maxwell, Steve A.
    Fuchs-Young, Robin
    Wells, Gregg B.
    Kapler, Geoffrey M.
    Conover, Gloria M.
    Green, Sheila
    Pepper, Catherine
    Gastel, Barbara
    Huston, David P.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 97 (05) : 684 - 688
  • [47] Commentary: "Leaning in" to Support Sex Differences in Basic Science and Clinical Research
    Woodruff, Teresa K.
    Kibbe, Melina R.
    Paller, Amy S.
    Turek, Fred W.
    Woolley, Catherine S.
    ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 155 (04) : 1181 - 1183
  • [48] What Is Hot and New in Basic and Translational Science in Liver Transplantation in 2023? Report of the Basic and Translational Research Committee of the International Liver Transplantation Society
    Bonaccorsi-Riani, Eliano
    Ghinolfi, Davide
    Czigany, Zoltan
    Dondossola, Daniele
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    Yuksel, Muhammed
    Boteon, Yuri L.
    Al-Adra, David
    Ho, Cheng-Maw
    Abdelrahim, Maen
    Pang, Li
    Barbas, Andrew
    Meier, Raphael
    Macparland, Sonya
    Sayed, Blayne Amir
    Pavan-Guimaraes, Juliana
    Brueggenwirth, Isabel M. A.
    Zarrinpar, Ali
    Mas, Valeria R.
    Selzner, Markus
    Martins, Paulo N.
    Bhat, Mamatha
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (05) : 1043 - 1052
  • [49] What Is Hot and New in Basic and Translational Science in Liver Transplantation in 2019? Report of the Basic and Translational Research Committee of the International Liver Transplantation Society
    Taner, Timucin
    Martins, Paulo N.
    Ling, Qi
    Ng, Kevin T.
    Huang, Kuang-Tzu
    Eymard, Corey
    Bhat, Mamatha
    Bonaccorsi-Riani, Eliano
    Mas, Valeria R.
    Selzner, Markus
    Ekser, Burcin
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 104 (03) : 516 - 521
  • [50] What Is Hot and New in Basic and Translational Science in Liver Transplantation in 2022? Report of the Basic and Translational Research Committee of the International Liver Transplantation Society
    Bhat, Mamatha
    Dondossola, Daniele
    Varghese, Rhea
    Czigany, Zoltan
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    Ghinolfi, Davide
    Al-Adra, David
    Bonaccorsi-Riani, Eliano
    Pang, Li
    Boteon, Yuri L.
    Brueggenwirth, Isabel
    Pavan-Guimaraes, Juliana
    Ho, Cheng-Maw
    Yuksel, Muhammed
    Zarrinpar, Ali
    Abdelrahim, Maen
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Mas, Valeria
    Selzner, Markus
    Martins, Paulo N.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (04) : 808 - 814