Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research

被引:189
|
作者
Yoon, Dustin Y. [1 ]
Mansukhani, Neel A. [1 ]
Stubbs, Vanessa C. [1 ]
Helenowski, Irene B. [2 ]
Woodruff, Teresa K. [3 ,4 ]
Kibbe, Melina R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Womens Hlth Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WOMENS HEALTH; PREVENTION; ASPIRIN; CELL; NIH;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although the Revitalization Act was passed in 1993 to increase enrollment of women in clinical trials, there has been little focus on sex disparity in basic and translational research. We hypothesize that sex bias exists in surgical biomedical research. Methods. Manuscripts from Annals of Surgery, American Journal of Surgery, JAMA Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, and Surgery from 2011 to 2012 were reviewed. Data abstracted included study type, sex of the animal or cell studied, location, and presence of sex-based reporting of data. Results. Of 2,347 articles reviewed, 618 included animals and/or cells. For animal research, 22% of the publications did not specify the sex of the animals. Of the reports that did specify the sex, 80% of publications included only males, 17% only females, and 3% both sexes. A greater disparity existed in the number of animals studied: 16,152 (84%) male and 3,173 (16%) female (P < .0001). For cell research, 76% of the publications did not specify the sex. Of the papers that did specify the sex, 71% of publications included only males, 21% only females, and 7% both sexes. Only 7 (1 %) studies reported sex-based results. For publications on female-prevalent diseases, 44% did not report the sex studied. Of those reports that specified the sex, only 12% studied female animals. More international than national (ie, United States) publications studied only males (85% vs 71%, P = .004), whereas more national publications did not specify the sex (47% vs 20%, P < .0001). A subanalysis of a single journal showed that across three decades, the number of male-only studies and usage of male animals has become more disparate over time. Conclusion. Sex bias, be it overt, inadvertent, situational, financial, or ignorant, exists in surgical biomedical research. Because biomedical research serves as the foundation for subsequent clinical research and medical decision-making, it is imperative that this disparity be addressed because conclusions derived from such studies may be specific to only one sex.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 516
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Basic/Translational Science Research Priorities*
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Hellman, Judith
    Ferrer Roca, Ricard
    De Backer, Daniel
    Coopersmith, Craig M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (08) : 1217 - 1232
  • [22] Lost in Translation-Basic Science in the Era of Translational Research
    Fang, Ferric C.
    Casadevall, Arturo
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2010, 78 (02) : 563 - 566
  • [23] The surviving sepsis campaign: basic/translational science research priorities
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Hellman, Judith
    Roca, Ricard Ferrer
    De Backer, Daniel
    Coopersmith, Craig M.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE EXPERIMENTAL, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [24] Translational research - from basic science of impulsivity to clinical implications
    Winstanley, C. A.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 : S208 - S208
  • [25] Neuroimaging in autism-from basic science to translational research
    Ecker, Christine
    Murphy, Declan
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2014, 10 (02) : 82 - 91
  • [26] Maternal behavior in basic science: translational research and clinical applicability
    Pires, Gabriel Natan
    Tufik, Sergio
    Giovenardi, Marcia
    Andersen, Monica Levy
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2013, 11 (02): : 256 - 260
  • [27] Bridging basic science and clinical practice in orthopaedic translational research
    Qi, Qiuli
    Qin, Ling
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2025, 50 : A1 - A4
  • [28] The surviving sepsis campaign: basic/translational science research priorities
    Clifford S. Deutschman
    Judith Hellman
    Ricard Ferrer Roca
    Daniel De Backer
    Craig M. Coopersmith
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 8
  • [29] Association of Author Gender With Sex Bias in Surgical Research
    Xiao, Nicholas
    Mansukhani, Neel A.
    de Oliveira, Diego F. Mendes
    Kibbe, Melina R.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (07) : 663 - 670
  • [30] The present and future of basic and translational science in liver transplantation - a survey study of the basic & translational research committee of the ILTS
    Czigany, Z.
    Putri, A. J.
    Meier, R.
    Dondossola, D.
    Emamaullee, J.
    Ghinolfi, D.
    Al-Adra, D.
    Pang, L.
    Boteon, Y. L.
    Brueggenwirth, I. M.
    Pavan-Guimaraes, J.
    Barbas, A.
    Abdelrahim, M.
    Ho, C. -M.
    Meister, F. A.
    MacParland, S.
    Sayed, B.
    Yuksel, M.
    Mas, V.
    Bhat, M.
    Bonaccorsi-Riani, E.
    Martins, P. N.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 30 : 263 - 264