Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research

被引:180
|
作者
Yoon, Dustin Y. [1 ]
Mansukhani, Neel A. [1 ]
Stubbs, Vanessa C. [1 ]
Helenowski, Irene B. [2 ]
Woodruff, Teresa K. [3 ,4 ]
Kibbe, Melina R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Womens Hlth Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WOMENS HEALTH; PREVENTION; ASPIRIN; CELL; NIH;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although the Revitalization Act was passed in 1993 to increase enrollment of women in clinical trials, there has been little focus on sex disparity in basic and translational research. We hypothesize that sex bias exists in surgical biomedical research. Methods. Manuscripts from Annals of Surgery, American Journal of Surgery, JAMA Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, and Surgery from 2011 to 2012 were reviewed. Data abstracted included study type, sex of the animal or cell studied, location, and presence of sex-based reporting of data. Results. Of 2,347 articles reviewed, 618 included animals and/or cells. For animal research, 22% of the publications did not specify the sex of the animals. Of the reports that did specify the sex, 80% of publications included only males, 17% only females, and 3% both sexes. A greater disparity existed in the number of animals studied: 16,152 (84%) male and 3,173 (16%) female (P < .0001). For cell research, 76% of the publications did not specify the sex. Of the papers that did specify the sex, 71% of publications included only males, 21% only females, and 7% both sexes. Only 7 (1 %) studies reported sex-based results. For publications on female-prevalent diseases, 44% did not report the sex studied. Of those reports that specified the sex, only 12% studied female animals. More international than national (ie, United States) publications studied only males (85% vs 71%, P = .004), whereas more national publications did not specify the sex (47% vs 20%, P < .0001). A subanalysis of a single journal showed that across three decades, the number of male-only studies and usage of male animals has become more disparate over time. Conclusion. Sex bias, be it overt, inadvertent, situational, financial, or ignorant, exists in surgical biomedical research. Because biomedical research serves as the foundation for subsequent clinical research and medical decision-making, it is imperative that this disparity be addressed because conclusions derived from such studies may be specific to only one sex.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 516
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary on "Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research"
    Crandall, Marie
    [J]. SURGERY, 2015, 157 (03) : 603 - 603
  • [2] Potential Sex Bias Exists in Orthopaedic Basic Science and Translational Research
    Bryant, Jessica
    Yi, Paul
    Miller, Liane
    Peek, Kacy
    Lee, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (02): : 124 - 130
  • [3] Sex bias in basic science and translational otolaryngology research
    Stephenson, Elizabeth D.
    Farzal, Zainab
    Kilpatrick, Lauren A.
    Senior, Brent A.
    Zanation, Adam M.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (03): : 613 - 618
  • [4] Determining If Sex Bias Exists in Human Surgical Clinical Research
    Mansukhani, Neel A.
    Yoon, Dustin Y.
    Teter, Katherine A.
    Stubbs, Vanessa C.
    Helenowski, Irene B.
    Woodruff, Teresa K.
    Kibbe, Melina R.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (11) : 1022 - 1030
  • [5] Basic science and translational research in JAMA
    Fontanarosa, PB
    DeAngelis, CD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (13): : 1728 - 1728
  • [6] The application of basic science to translational cancer research
    Paul Ko Ferrigno
    [J]. Genome Biology, 4 (2):
  • [8] Basic science and translational research in robotic surgery
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2012, 6 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [9] Gender bias exists in research
    GoldbeckWood, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7111): : 766 - 766
  • [10] Pearls and Pitfalls for Surgical Investigators in Basic and Translational Research
    Dudeja, Vikas
    Smithson, Mary
    Chen, Herbert
    Keswani, Sundeep
    Brock, Malcolm
    Goldstein, Allan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 279 : A1 - A7