Test-retest reliability of the unsupported upper-limb exercise test (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adult individuals

被引:22
|
作者
Lima, Vanessa Pereira [1 ]
Velloso, Marcelo [2 ]
Almeida, Fabiana Damasceno [2 ]
Carmona, Bianca [2 ]
Ribeiro-Samora, Giane Amorim [2 ]
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vales Jequitinhonha & Mucuri Ufvjm, Dept Phys Therapy, Diamantina, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais Ufmg, Dept Phys Therapy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] McGill Univ, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ H3A 0G4, Canada
关键词
Upper extremity; exercise; reliability; endurance; COPD and exercise tolerance; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; BETWEEN-DAY RELIABILITY; ARM; COPD; HYPERINFLATION; GUIDELINES; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2018.1425786
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: The unsupported upper-limb exercise (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring tests (6PBRTs) have been developed to measure peak unsupported arm exercise capacity and arm endurance, respectively, in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These tests are valid and reproducible in this population; however, the reproducibility of healthy adults is currently unknown. Objective: To determine the within-day test-retest reliability of the UULEX and 6PBRT in healthy adults. Method: The study included 41 healthy adults, aged 38.3 +/- 17.9years old, who performed both tests, twice each on the same day, with a 30-min rest in between. Before and immediately after the tests, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), perception of exertion, and arm fatigue were measured. Time to perform the test and number of rings moved were recorded for the UULEX and 6PBRT, respectively. Results: The UULEX was reproducible on Bland-Altman analysis with lower and upper limits of agreement: 2.40 and -2.49min, respectively (bias=-0.05; p=0.817) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.85 (p<0.0001) for time in minutes for the first and second tests. The 6PBRT was not reproducible on Bland-Altman analysis with lower and upper limits of agreement of 31.64 and -114.54 (bias=-41.45; p<0.0001) and ICC=0.91 (p<0.0001) for the number of rings moved. Conclusion: UULEX is a reliable test in healthy adults. Only one test is adequate when measuring peak unsupported arm exercise capacity using the UULEX in healthy adults, while more than two tests may be needed to measure arm endurance using the 6PBRT.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 812
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] Test-retest reliability of cardiopulmonary exercise test-derived metrics in individuals with COPD versus healthy controls
    Mohammad, Milan
    Thomsen, Rie S.
    Rasmussen, Iben E.
    Andersen, Amalie B.
    Hartmann, Jacob P.
    Berg, Ronan M. G.
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [22] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke
    Bernadette C. Tobler-Ammann
    Eling D. de Bruin
    Marie-Christine Fluet
    Olivier Lambercy
    Rob A. de Bie
    Ruud H. Knols
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13
  • [23] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke
    Tobler-Ammann, Bernadette C.
    de Bruin, Eling D.
    Fluet, Marie-Christine
    Lambercy, Olivier
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Knols, Ruud H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 13
  • [24] The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) for Evaluation of Upper Limbs Functional Capacity in Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation Study
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Lopes, Paulo Henrique
    Costa, Henrique Silveira
    Costa, Maria Carolina Barbosa
    Rocha, Jefferson Freitas
    Rodrigues, Vanessa Gomes Brandao
    Maciel, Emilio Henrique Barroso
    Alves, Frederico Lopes
    Prates, Maria Cecilia Sales Mendes
    Campos, Patricia Cardoso
    Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2023,
  • [25] Validity and Reliability of the 6-min Pegboard and Ring Test in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
    Maden, Cagtay
    Karabulut, Demet Gozacan
    Yigit, Sedat
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2025, 71 (02) : 200 - 207
  • [26] Concurrent validity and reliability of new application for 6-min walk test in healthy adults
    Mekritthikrai, Nuttawuth
    Yuenyongchaiwat, Kornanong
    Thanawattano, Chusak
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [27] Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold measurements of the upper limb and torso in young healthy women
    Jones, David H.
    Kilgour, Robert D.
    Comtoist, Alain S.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 8 (08): : 650 - 656
  • [28] Assessment of the determinants of changes and test–retest reliability in the 6-min walk test performance over a 4-month period in healthy 6–12-year-old children
    Tamara del Corral
    Javier Tapia-Castañeda
    Gonzalo Ríos-Pérez
    Paula Triviño-López
    Nerea Sastre-Moreno
    Pablo García Fernández
    Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2022, 122 : 935 - 944
  • [29] Test-retest reliability and validity of the 6 minute stepper test to evaluate functional exercise capacity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
    Bayram, Selin
    Oskay, Deran
    Tore, Nurten Gizem
    Sari, Fulden
    Sarac, Devrim Can
    Pala, Gamze Gulsun
    Salman, Reyhan Bilici
    Tufan, Abdurrahman
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (06) : 1129 - 1136
  • [30] Test-retest reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in adult patients with asthma
    Meys, R.
    Janssen, S. M. J.
    Franssena, F. M. E.
    Vaesa, A. W.
    Stoffels, A. A. F.
    van Hees, H. W. H.
    van den Borstd, B.
    Klijn, P. H.
    Burtin, C.
    van 't Hul, A. J.
    Spruit, M. A.
    PULMONOLOGY, 2023, 29 (06): : 486 - 494