L1 AND L2 WORD RECOGNITION IN FINNISH Examining L1 Effects on L2 Processing of Morphological Complexity and Morphophonological Transparency

被引:11
|
作者
Vainio, Seppo [1 ]
Pajunen, Anneli [2 ]
Hyona, Jukka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT; INFLECTED WORDS; SENTENCE INTERPRETATION; MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; AFFIXAL HOMONYMY; LANGUAGE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; FREQUENCY; ENGLISH; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S0272263113000478
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effect of the first language (L1) on the visual word recognition of inflected nouns in second language (L2) Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. Case inflection is common in Russian and in Finnish but nonexistent in Chinese. Several models have been posited to describe L2 morphological processing. The unified competition model (UCM; MacWhinney, 2005) predicts L1-L2 transfer, whereas processability theory (Pienemann, 1998) posits a universal hierarchy in L2 acquisition regardless of the L1. The morphological decomposition deficiency hypothesis (Ullman, 2001b; VanPatten, 2004) claims that nonnatives cannot morphologically decompose words. Finally, DeKeyser (2005) proposes that morphophonological transparency affects nonnative processing. The current study explores which model best accounts for the processing of L2 Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. The materials included simple nouns, transparently inflected nouns, and semitransparently inflected nouns. The results showed that Finns and Russians had longer reaction times (RTs) for morphologically complex nouns, but Chinese had longer RTs for semitransparent nouns. The RT results support the UCM by showing a L1-L2 transfer. Furthermore, transparency influenced word recognition among nonnatives; they made the most errors with semitransparent nouns.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 162
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of English L2 on Norwegian L1
    Sunde, Anne Mette
    Kristoffersen, Martin
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, 2018, 41 (03) : 275 - 307
  • [22] Is there a critical period for L1 but not L2?
    Newport, Elissa L.
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2018, 21 (05) : 928 - 929
  • [23] BOUND STEM PROCESSING IN L1 AND L2 ITALIAN
    Piccinin, Sabrina
    Dal Maso, Serena
    Giraudo, Helene
    [J]. LINGUE E LINGUAGGIO, 2018, 17 (02) : 289 - 305
  • [24] The effects of L1 phonological and orthographic systems on L2 word identification
    Wang, L
    Abe, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 102 - 102
  • [25] Planning to speak in L1 and L2
    Konopka, Agnieszka E.
    Meyer, Antje
    Forest, Tess A.
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 102 : 72 - 104
  • [26] Collocational Processing in L1 and L2: The Effects of Word Frequency, Collocational Frequency, and Association
    Oeksuez, Dogus
    Brezina, Vaclav
    Rebuschat, Patrick
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2021, 71 (01) : 55 - 98
  • [27] Effects of L1 Phonotactic Constraints on L2 Word Segmentation Strategies
    Katayama, Tamami
    [J]. 17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2016), VOLS 1-5: UNDERSTANDING SPEECH PROCESSING IN HUMANS AND MACHINES, 2016, : 190 - 194
  • [28] The Relation Between L1 and L2
    王慧
    [J]. 海外英语, 2017, (12) : 218 - 219
  • [29] The Influence of L1 on L2 Learning
    Bao Bo
    [J]. 校园英语, 2020, (10) : 196 - 198
  • [30] L1 in the L2 classroom: why not?
    Galindo Merino, Ma Mar
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DE LINGUISTICA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE-ELUA, 2011, (25): : 163 - 204