Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children

被引:138
|
作者
Hughes, ML
Brown, CJ
Abbas, PJ
Wolaver, AA
Gervais, JP
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2000年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-200004000-00010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) thresholds and the MAP thresholds (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (C-levels) in children implanted with the Nucleus 24 device. Design: EAP thresholds were measured using the Neural Response Telemetry system of the Nucleus 24 device. Twenty children implanted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant participated in this study. EAP thresholds were compared with the behavioral measures of T- and C-level used to construct the MAP these children used on a daily basis. For these subjects, both EAP and MAP T- and C-levels were obtained the same visit, which occurred at 3 to 5 mo postconnection. Results: EAP thresholds were shown to fall between MAP T- and C-level for 18 of 20 subjects tested; however, considerable variability across subjects was noted. On average, EAP thresholds fell at 53% of the MAP dynamic range. Correlations between EAP threshold and MAP T- and C-level improved substantially when combined with behavioral measures obtained from one electrode in the array. Conclusions: Moderate correlations were found between EAP thresholds and MAP T- and C-levels for the children participating in this study. However, a technique is described for improving the accuracy of predictions of MAP T- and C-levels based on EAP data combined with a small amount of behavioral information.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 174
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neural response thresholds in the Nucleus Contour cochlear implant before and after stylet removal
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria
    Peralta, Cristina Ornelas
    Guedes, Mariana Cardoso
    Magalhaes, Ana Tereza
    Brito Neto, Rubens
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (11) : 1330 - 1336
  • [22] A COMPARISON BETWEEN ELECTRICALLY ELICITED STAPEDIUS REFLEX THRESHOLDS AND THRESHOLDS OF DISCOMFORT IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS
    GATTAZ, G
    BATTMER, RD
    LEHNHARDT, E
    GNADEBERG, D
    HNO, 1992, 40 (12) : 480 - 483
  • [23] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ELECTRICAL ACOUSTIC REFLEX THRESHOLDS AND BEHAVIORAL COMFORT LEVELS IN CHILDREN AND ADULT COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS
    SPIVAK, LG
    CHUTE, PM
    EAR AND HEARING, 1994, 15 (02): : 184 - 192
  • [24] Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the nucleus 22 cochlear implant
    Skinner, MW
    Holden, LK
    Holden, TA
    Demorest, ME
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1999, 42 (04): : 814 - 828
  • [25] Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception and speech production outcomes
    Psarros, CE
    Plant, KL
    Lee, K
    Decker, JA
    Whitford, LA
    Cowan, RSC
    EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (01): : 18S - 27S
  • [26] Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems
    Ramsden, R
    Greenham, P
    O'Driscoll, M
    Mawman, D
    Proops, D
    Craddock, L
    Fielden, C
    Graham, J
    Meerton, L
    Verschuur, C
    Toner, J
    McAnallen, T
    Osborne, J
    Doran, M
    Gray, R
    Pickerill, M
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 988 - 998
  • [27] Effects of subject adjustment of cochlear implant comfort in adult Nucleus 24 users
    Sislian, N
    Neuman, A
    Madell, J
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 173 - 177
  • [28] The Nucleus® 24 Contour™ cochlear implant system:: Adult clinical trial results
    Parkinson, AJ
    Arcaroli, J
    Staller, SJ
    Arndt, PL
    Cosgriff, A
    Ebinger, K
    EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (01): : 41S - 48S
  • [29] Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant
    Shallop, JK
    Facer, GW
    Peterson, A
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1999, 109 (11): : 1755 - 1759
  • [30] Objective Findings with Malpositioning of a Nucleus 24RE(CA) Cochlear Implant
    Pijl, Sipke
    Westerberg, Brian D.
    Gustin, Cindy
    Fong, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (05) : 435 - 442