Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy

被引:17
|
作者
Takeda, Akihiro [1 ]
Imoto, Sanae [1 ]
Nakamura, Hiromi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tajimi, Gifu 5078522, Japan
关键词
Adnexal mass; Gasless laparoscopic surgery; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Obstetric outcome; Pregnancy; Surgical outcome; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; WOUND RETRACTOR; CENTER EXPERIENCE; CASE SERIES; TUMORS; CYSTECTOMY; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; LESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of gasless transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery with abdominal-wall lift method for the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Study design: Retrospective study of 29 women each undergoing gasless LESS surgery and multiport laparoscopic surgery for the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. The two groups were compared for their surgical and pregnancy outcome measures. Results: Conceptions occurred spontaneously in all women including 2 cases each of monochorionic-diamniotic twins in both groups. Three and 2 cases of bilateral adnexal masses were noted in the LESS surgery group and the multiport laparoscopic surgery group, respectively. Estimated gestational age at surgery was significantly older and tumor diameter was significantly larger in the LESS surgery group than in the multiport laparoscopic surgery group. However, significant differences between the two groups were not evident in other patient demographics. There were no significant differences in type of surgery between the two groups. In 28 masses that received LESS adnexal cystectomy, LESS-assisted extracorporeal cystectomy was achieved in 23 masses. Excised tissue weight in the LESS surgery group was significantly heavier than-in the multiport laparoscopic surgery group. Significant differences were not observed in other operative parameters between the two groups. Significant differences in postoperative complications were not identified between the two groups. Benign pathologies were obtained in 61 masses from both groups, except for a case of clear cell carcinoma managed by LESS salpingo-oophorectomy. Significant differences in pathological diagnosis were not observed between the two groups. Delivery of 61 neonates occurred in 57 women except for the case of clear cell carcinoma in which termination of the pregnancy was chosen. In the LESS surgery group, threatened premature delivery requiring admission and preterm delivery was noted in 3 and 4 cases, respectively. However, significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were not identified between the two groups. The neonatal course was uneventful in all infants. Conclusion: Gasless LESS surgery for adnexal masses during pregnancy is a safe and feasible alternative to multiport laparoscopic surgery, with the avoidance of potential negative effects of carbon dioxide gas insufflation on mother and fetus. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 34
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE ASSISTED TRANSSEXUAL SURGERY
    Xu, Abai
    Liu, Chunxiao
    Zheng, Shaobo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A129 - A130
  • [42] Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Humphrey, John E.
    Canes, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 416 - 428
  • [43] Devices for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Kommu, Sashi S.
    Rane, Abhay
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2009, 6 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [44] LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE SURGERY RADICAL CYSTECTOMY
    Ma Lulin
    Zhang Fan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A126 - A126
  • [45] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for urachal remnants
    Iida, T.
    Kawa, G.
    Takizawa, N.
    Kawabata, T.
    Komai, Y.
    Kinoshita, H.
    Matsuda, T.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2012, 5 (02) : 100 - 102
  • [46] Early experience with isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using a wound retractor for the management of ectopic pregnancy
    Takeda, Akihiro
    Imoto, Sanae
    Mori, Masahiko
    Nakano, Tomoko
    Nakamura, Hiromi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 154 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [47] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study
    Cho, Yeon Jean
    Kim, Mi-La
    Lee, Soo Yoon
    Lee, Hee Suk
    Kim, Joo Myoung
    Joo, Kwan Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 4 : 85 - 91
  • [48] Laparoendoscopic single-site salpingectomy for treatment of ectopic pregnancy
    Calcagno, Marco
    Pastore, Maria
    Montanino, Mario
    di Palumbo, Vincenzo Scotto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 116 (01) : 81 - 81
  • [49] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses
    Rosoff, James S.
    Fine, Ronnie G.
    Velez, Marissa C.
    Del Pizzo, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [50] Ectopic pregnancy: laparoendoscopic single-site surgery-laparoscopic surgery through a single cutaneous incision
    Savaris, Ricardo Francalacci
    Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (03) : 1170.e5 - 1170.e7