Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy

被引:17
|
作者
Takeda, Akihiro [1 ]
Imoto, Sanae [1 ]
Nakamura, Hiromi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tajimi, Gifu 5078522, Japan
关键词
Adnexal mass; Gasless laparoscopic surgery; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Obstetric outcome; Pregnancy; Surgical outcome; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; WOUND RETRACTOR; CENTER EXPERIENCE; CASE SERIES; TUMORS; CYSTECTOMY; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; LESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of gasless transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery with abdominal-wall lift method for the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Study design: Retrospective study of 29 women each undergoing gasless LESS surgery and multiport laparoscopic surgery for the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. The two groups were compared for their surgical and pregnancy outcome measures. Results: Conceptions occurred spontaneously in all women including 2 cases each of monochorionic-diamniotic twins in both groups. Three and 2 cases of bilateral adnexal masses were noted in the LESS surgery group and the multiport laparoscopic surgery group, respectively. Estimated gestational age at surgery was significantly older and tumor diameter was significantly larger in the LESS surgery group than in the multiport laparoscopic surgery group. However, significant differences between the two groups were not evident in other patient demographics. There were no significant differences in type of surgery between the two groups. In 28 masses that received LESS adnexal cystectomy, LESS-assisted extracorporeal cystectomy was achieved in 23 masses. Excised tissue weight in the LESS surgery group was significantly heavier than-in the multiport laparoscopic surgery group. Significant differences were not observed in other operative parameters between the two groups. Significant differences in postoperative complications were not identified between the two groups. Benign pathologies were obtained in 61 masses from both groups, except for a case of clear cell carcinoma managed by LESS salpingo-oophorectomy. Significant differences in pathological diagnosis were not observed between the two groups. Delivery of 61 neonates occurred in 57 women except for the case of clear cell carcinoma in which termination of the pregnancy was chosen. In the LESS surgery group, threatened premature delivery requiring admission and preterm delivery was noted in 3 and 4 cases, respectively. However, significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were not identified between the two groups. The neonatal course was uneventful in all infants. Conclusion: Gasless LESS surgery for adnexal masses during pregnancy is a safe and feasible alternative to multiport laparoscopic surgery, with the avoidance of potential negative effects of carbon dioxide gas insufflation on mother and fetus. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 34
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with intraoperative autologous blood transfusion for management of ectopic pregnancy with significant hemoperitoneum: a retrospective observational study
    Takeda, Akihiro
    Tsuge, Shiori
    Shibata, Mayu
    Shinone, Sanae
    Nakamura, Hiromi
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2019, 16
  • [22] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Eisenberg, Manuel S.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [23] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology
    Sobolewski, Craig
    Yeung, Patrick P., Jr.
    Hart, Stuart
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 38 (04) : 741 - +
  • [24] Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Altunrende, Fatih
    Yang, Bo
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (06) : 923 - 927
  • [25] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    Cohen, Sarah
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    Gunderson, Camille
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 22 (04) : 331 - 338
  • [26] Urologic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Kyriazis, Iason
    Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2009, 6 (12) : 654 - 659
  • [27] Urologic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
    Evangelos Liatsikos
    Panagiotis Kallidonis
    Iason Kyriazis
    Abdulrahman Al-Aown
    Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2009, 6 : 654 - 659
  • [28] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy
    Vidal, Oscar
    Valentini, Mauro
    Ginesta, Cesar
    Marti, Josep
    Espert, Juan J.
    Benarroch, Guerson
    Garcia-Valdecasas, Juan C.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (03): : 686 - 691
  • [29] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy
    Óscar Vidal
    Mauro Valentini
    Cesar Ginestà
    Josep Martí
    Juan J. Espert
    Guerson Benarroch
    Juan C. García-Valdecasas
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 686 - 691
  • [30] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Berkowitz, Jared R.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2009, 1 (05) : 259 - 266