Multi-criteria Assessment Model of Technologies

被引:0
|
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
Volvaciovas, Robertas [1 ]
Kildiene, Simona [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL | 2013年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
MCDM; model; ELECTRE IV; MULTIMOORA; SWARA-TOPSIS; SWARA-ELECTRE III; SWARA-VIKOR; facades; thermal insulation; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; MOORA METHOD; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; REFURBISHMENT; CONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; MULTIMOORA; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Construction is a sector that accepts innovations slowly. Selection of effective technological systems in construction is a complex multi-criteria task. Many decision-makers refuse innovations once faced with similar difficulties. The article presents an original approach towards a development of multi-criteria assessment and ranking technique for alternatives of technology in construction. The problem was solved using different well-known MCDM methods ELECTRE IV and MULTIMOORA. Three hybrid methods SWARA-TOPSIS, SWARA-ELECTRE III, SWARA-VIKOR were used to solve the same problem. Priority of considered alternatives was determined based on the average of alternatives performance rank. The article presents a practical case study on evaluation of different alternatives for public buildings refurbishment using typical and novel thermal insulation technologies for facades. Research results demonstrate that novel facades thermal insulation alternatives for facades have a higher performance level than commonly used ones.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis
    Maxim, Alexandru
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 : 284 - 297
  • [22] Human health assessment for remediation technologies (HEART): a multi-criteria decision analysis tool
    Soltani, Atousa
    Dyck, Roberta
    Hossaini, Navid
    Mohapatra, Asish
    Hewage, Kasun
    Sadiq, Rehan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 7 (02) : 183 - 200
  • [23] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Shaaban, Mostafa
    Scheffran, Juergen
    Boehner, Juergen
    Elsobki, Mohamed S.
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (05)
  • [24] A qualitative multi-criteria modelling approach to the assessment of electric energy production technologies in Slovenia
    Bohanec, Marko
    Trdin, Nejc
    Kontic, Branko
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 25 (03) : 611 - 625
  • [25] A Multi-criteria Assessment of Biomass Conversion Technologies with Pythagorean Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach
    Ilbahar, Esra
    Cebi, Selcuk
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 37 (3-4) : 317 - 334
  • [26] MULTI-CRITERIA TECHNOLOGIES FOR MANAGERIAL DECISIONS SYSTEM ANALYSIS
    Nykyforov, Anatolii
    Sushchenko, Olena
    Petrova, Mariana
    Pohuda, Nataliia
    ACCESS-ACCESS TO SCIENCE BUSINESS INNOVATION IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY, 2021, 2 (02): : 150 - 161
  • [27] Farm reorientation assessment model based on multi-criteria decision making
    Nikoloski, Trajce
    Udovc, Andrej
    Pavlovic, Martin
    Rajkovic, Uros
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 140 : 237 - 243
  • [28] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Assessment Model for Feasibility Studies of Transportation Projects
    Sal, Ozlem Battal
    Cubuk, M. Kursat
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2022, 25 (03): : 1191 - 1199
  • [29] An Early Multi-Criteria Risk Assessment Model: Requirement Engineering Perspective
    Chandani, Priyanka
    Gupta, Chetna
    JOURNAL OF CASES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 21 (02) : 51 - 64
  • [30] Operational Risk Management Using Multi-Criteria Assessment (AHP Model)
    Ristanovic, Vladimir
    Primorac, Dinko
    Kozina, Goran
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2021, 28 (02): : 678 - 683