Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:171
|
作者
Maxim, Alexandru [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Doctoral Sch Econ & Business Adm, Iasi 700080, Romania
关键词
Electricity generation; Sustainable development; Multi-criteria decision analysis; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; POWER-GENERATION; ENERGY SECURITY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; EXTERNAL COSTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INDICATORS; HYDROPOWER; COUNTRIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.059
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Solving the issue of environmental degradation due to the expansion of the World's energy demand requires a balanced approach. The aim of this paper is to comprehensively rank a large number of electricity generation technologies based on their compatibility with the sustainable development of the industry. The study is based on a set of 10 sustainability indicators which provide a life cycle analysis of the plants. The technologies are ranked using a weighted sum multi-attribute utility method. The indicator weights were established through a survey of 62 academics from the fields of energy and environmental science. Our results show that large hydroelectric projects are the most sustainable technology type, followed by small hydro, onshore wind and solar photovoltaic. We argue that political leaders should have a more structured and strategic approach in implementing sustainable energy policies and this type of research can provide arguments to support such decisions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 297
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Shaaban, Mostafa
    Scheffran, Juergen
    Boehner, Juergen
    Elsobki, Mohamed S.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (05)
  • [2] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach
    Bhandari, Ramchandra
    Arce, Benjamin Eduardo
    Sessa, Vittorio
    Adamou, Rabani
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [3] Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis
    Truc T. Q. Vo
    Ao Xia
    Fionn Rogan
    David M. Wall
    Jerry D. Murphy
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2017, 19 : 689 - 703
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis
    Vo, Truc T. Q.
    Xia, Ao
    Rogan, Fionn
    Wall, David M.
    Murphy, Jerry D.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (03) : 689 - 703
  • [5] Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Sliogeriene, Jurate
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 85 : 148 - 156
  • [6] Sustainability evaluation of power generation technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The Kenyan case
    Manirambona, Egide
    Talai, Stephen M.
    Kimutai, Stephen K.
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 (14901-14914) : 14901 - 14914
  • [7] Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment
    Khan, Imran
    Kabir, Zobaidul
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 : 320 - 333
  • [8] Evaluation of electricity supply sustainability and security: Multi-criteria decision analysis approach
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Dong, Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 438 - 453
  • [9] Comparing the sustainability of US electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis
    Klein, Sharon J. W.
    Whalley, Stephanie
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 79 : 127 - 149
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of tertiary wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria analysis
    Plakas, K. V.
    Georgiadis, A. A.
    Karabelas, A. J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 73 (07) : 1532 - 1540