Mechanical properties of human bone-implant interface tissue in aseptically loose hip implants

被引:21
|
作者
Kraaij, Gert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zadpoor, Amir A. [2 ]
Tuijthof, Gabrielle J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dankelman, Jenny [2 ]
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. [1 ,3 ]
Valstar, Edward R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Biomech & Imaging Grp, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biomech Engn, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Hip; Prosthesis; Loosening; Interface membrane; Biomechanics; SOFT BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; SYNOVIAL-LIKE MEMBRANE; CEMENT INTERFACE; BRAIN-TISSUE; UNCONFINED COMPRESSION; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; IN-VITRO; KIDNEY; ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The main cause of failure in total hip replacement is aseptic loosening which is associated with the formation of a periprosthetic fibrous (interface) tissue. Despite important applications for finite element modeling of loose implants, the mechanical properties of the bone implant interface tissue have never been measured in humans. In this study, we performed unconfined compression tests to characterize the mechanical properties of the interface tissue and to determine the parameters of various hyperelastic material models which were fitted to the measurements. Human interface tissues were retrieved during 21 elective revision surgeries from aseptically loosened cemented (N=10) and uncemented hip implants (N=11). Specimens were tested at a fixed deformation rate of 0.1 mm/min up to a maximum force of 10 N. Elastic moduli for low and high strain regions of the stress strain curves were determined. Interface tissue from aseptically loose cemented prostheses shows higher elastic moduli (mean=1.85 MPa, 95% C.I.=1.76-1.95 MPa) in the high strain region as compared to that of the interface tissue from the cementless group (mean=1.65 MPa, 95% C.I.=1.43-1.88 MPa). The 5-terms Mooney Rivlin model (W = C-1[I-1 - 3] + C-2[I-2 - 3] + C-3[I-1 - 3][I-2 - 3] + C-4[I-1 - 3](2) + C-5[I-2 - 3](2)) described the stress strain behavior the best. Large variations in the mechanical behavior were observed both between specimens from the same patient as between those of different patients. The material model parameters were therefore estimated for the mean data as well as for the curves with the highest and lowest strain at the maximum load. The model parameters found for the mean data were C-1=-0.0074 MPa, C-2=0.0019 MPa, C-3=0 MPa, C-4=0.0032 MPa and C-5=0 MPa in the cemented group and C-1=0.0137 MPa, C-2=0.0069 MPa, C-3=0.0026 MPa, C-4=-0.0094 MPa and C-5=0 MPa in the cementless group. The results of this study can be used in finite element computer. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does a pro-angiogenic state exist in the bone-implant interface of aseptically loosened joint prosthesis?
    Jell, GMR
    Al-Saffar, N
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 12 (10-12) : 1069 - 1073
  • [22] Bone-implant degradation and mechanical response of bone surrounding Mg-alloy implants
    Meischel, Martin
    Hoermann, Daniel
    Draxler, Johannes
    Tschegg, Elmar K.
    Eichler, Johannes
    Prohaska, Thomas
    Stanzl-Tscheg, Stefanie E.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2017, 71 : 307 - 313
  • [23] The bone-implant interface: A dynamic surface
    Goldberg, VM
    Jinno, T
    JOURNAL OF LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF MEDICAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 9 (1-2) : 11 - 21
  • [24] Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface
    Puleo, DA
    Nanci, A
    BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (23-24) : 2311 - 2321
  • [25] Multiscale Analyses of the Bone-implant Interface
    Cha, J. Y.
    Pereira, M. D.
    Smith, A. A.
    Houschyar, K. S.
    Yin, X.
    Mouraret, S.
    Brunski, J. B.
    Helms, J. A.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (03) : 482 - 490
  • [26] Stress shielding at the bone-implant interface: Influence of surface roughness and of the bone-implant contact ratio
    Raffa, Maria Letizia
    Nguyen, Vu-Hieu
    Hernigou, Philippe
    Flouzat-Lachaniette, Charles-Henri
    Haiat, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (06) : 1174 - 1183
  • [27] Development of self-anchoring bone implants .2. Bone-implant interface characteristics in vitro
    Vemuganti, A
    Siegler, S
    Abusafieh, A
    Kalidindi, S
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1997, 38 (04): : 328 - 336
  • [28] The bone-implant interface in regenerated bone and in host bone.
    Weng, D
    Hoffmeyer, M
    Hürzeler, MB
    Richter, EJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 510 - 510
  • [29] TISSUE-RESPONSE AT THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE IN A HYDROXYLAPATITE AUGMENTED MANDIBULAR RIDGE
    PAGE, DG
    LASKIN, DM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1987, 45 (04) : 356 - 358
  • [30] The effects of particulate bone cements at the bone-implant interface
    Wimhurst, JA
    Brooks, RA
    Rushton, N
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (04): : 588 - 592