Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia

被引:30
|
作者
Zimmerer, Vitor C. [1 ]
Cowell, Patricia E. [2 ]
Varley, Rosemary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London WC1N 1PF, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Human Commun Sci, Sheffield S10 2TS, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Aphasia; Agrammatism; Syntax; Artificial grammar learning; THEMATIC ROLE ASSIGNMENT; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; BROCAS APHASIA; SYNTACTIC COMPREHENSION; LANGUAGE; SENSITIVITY; VIOLATIONS; PATTERN; FACULTY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One factor in syntactic impairment in aphasia might be damage to general structure processing systems. In such a case, deficits would be evident in the processing of syntactically structured non-linguistic information. To explore this hypothesis, we examined performances on artificial grammar learning (AGL) tasks in which the grammar was expressed in non-linguistic visual forms. In the first experiment, AGL behavior of four aphasic participants with severe syntactic impairment, five aphasic participants without syntactic impairment, and healthy controls was examined. Participants were trained on sequences of nonsense stimuli with the structure inn. Data were analyzed at an individual level to identify different behavioral profiles and account for heterogeneity in aphasic as well as healthy groups. Healthy controls and patients without syntactic impairment were more likely to learn configurational (item order) than quantitative (counting) regularities. Quantitative regularities were only detected by individuals who also detected the configurational properties of the stimulus sequences. By contrast, two individuals with syntactic impairment learned quantitative regularities, but showed no sensitivity towards configurational structure. They also failed to detect configurational structure in a second experiment in which sequences were structured by the grammar A B. We discuss the potential relationship between AGL and processing of word order as well as the potential of AGL in clinical practice. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning
    Eitam, Baruch
    Schul, Yaacov
    Hassin, Ran R.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (02): : 228 - 238
  • [32] The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning
    Pothos, EM
    Bailey, TM
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (04) : 847 - 862
  • [33] Recoding and representation in artificial grammar learning
    Chrissy M. Chubala
    Randall K. Jamieson
    Behavior Research Methods, 2013, 45 : 470 - 479
  • [34] Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning
    T. Beesley
    A. J. Wills
    M. E. Le Pelley
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, 17 : 122 - 128
  • [35] Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation
    Redington, M
    Chater, N
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1996, 125 (02) : 123 - 138
  • [36] Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar
    Vitor C. Zimmerer
    Patricia E. Cowell
    Rosemary A. Varley
    Memory & Cognition, 2011, 39 : 491 - 501
  • [37] Grammar and cognition: deficits comprehending counterfactuals in Turkish individuals with Broca's aphasia
    Duman, Tuba Yarbay
    Altinok, Nermin
    Mavis, Ilknur
    APHASIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (07) : 841 - 861
  • [38] Grammar and fluent aphasia
    Edwards, S
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 74 (03) : 560 - 563
  • [39] Variations on the written choice communication strategy for individuals with severe aphasia
    Lasker, Joanne
    Hux, Karen
    Garrett, Kathryn L.
    Moncrief, Erika M.
    Eischeid, Tammy J.
    AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1997, 13 (02): : 108 - 116
  • [40] Efficacy of Group Conversation Intervention in Individuals with Severe Profiles of Aphasia
    Hoover, Elizabeth
    McFee, Alexandra
    DeDe, Gayle
    SEMINARS IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2020, 41 (01) : 71 - 82