Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia

被引:30
|
作者
Zimmerer, Vitor C. [1 ]
Cowell, Patricia E. [2 ]
Varley, Rosemary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London WC1N 1PF, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Human Commun Sci, Sheffield S10 2TS, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Aphasia; Agrammatism; Syntax; Artificial grammar learning; THEMATIC ROLE ASSIGNMENT; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; BROCAS APHASIA; SYNTACTIC COMPREHENSION; LANGUAGE; SENSITIVITY; VIOLATIONS; PATTERN; FACULTY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One factor in syntactic impairment in aphasia might be damage to general structure processing systems. In such a case, deficits would be evident in the processing of syntactically structured non-linguistic information. To explore this hypothesis, we examined performances on artificial grammar learning (AGL) tasks in which the grammar was expressed in non-linguistic visual forms. In the first experiment, AGL behavior of four aphasic participants with severe syntactic impairment, five aphasic participants without syntactic impairment, and healthy controls was examined. Participants were trained on sequences of nonsense stimuli with the structure inn. Data were analyzed at an individual level to identify different behavioral profiles and account for heterogeneity in aphasic as well as healthy groups. Healthy controls and patients without syntactic impairment were more likely to learn configurational (item order) than quantitative (counting) regularities. Quantitative regularities were only detected by individuals who also detected the configurational properties of the stimulus sequences. By contrast, two individuals with syntactic impairment learned quantitative regularities, but showed no sensitivity towards configurational structure. They also failed to detect configurational structure in a second experiment in which sequences were structured by the grammar A B. We discuss the potential relationship between AGL and processing of word order as well as the potential of AGL in clinical practice. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Explicit knowledge in artificial grammar learning
    Meulemans, T
    PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 2002, 42 (03) : 213 - 225
  • [22] Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning
    Gomez, RL
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 33 (02) : 154 - 207
  • [23] Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning
    Skosnik, PD
    Mirza, F
    Gitelman, DR
    Parrish, TB
    Mesulam, MM
    Reber, PJ
    NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) : 1306 - 1314
  • [24] An entropy model for artificial grammar learning
    Pothos, Emmanuel M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 1
  • [25] Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar
    Zimmerer, Vitor C.
    Cowell, Patricia E.
    Varley, Rosemary A.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2011, 39 (03) : 491 - 501
  • [26] Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning
    Shanks, DR
    Johnstone, T
    Staggs, L
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01): : 216 - 252
  • [27] An entropy model of artificial grammar learning
    Pothos, EM
    Bailey, TM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY FIRST ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1999, : 549 - 554
  • [28] The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning
    Rebecca L. Gomez
    Louann Gerken
    Roger W. Schvaneveldt
    Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 : 253 - 263
  • [29] Implicit and Explicit Learning in Individuals with Agrammatic Aphasia
    Julia Schuchard
    Cynthia K. Thompson
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2014, 43 : 209 - 224
  • [30] Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning
    Beesley, T.
    Wills, A. J.
    Le Pelley, M. E.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (01) : 122 - 128