The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Lily Y. L. [1 ]
Sun, Terri [1 ]
Ree, Ronald [1 ,2 ]
Dunsmuir, Dustin [1 ,3 ]
Dotto, Alexander [1 ,4 ]
Ansermino, J. Mark [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Yarnold, Cynthia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol & Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] St Pauls Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Providence Hlth Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] BC Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] BC Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Anesthesia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
INTENSITY; MANAGEMENT; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-019-01324-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposeThe Pain assessment using a novel digital application (Panda) is a smartphone application that contains the digital versions of the visual analogue scale (VAS-100) and numeric rating scale (NRS-11). This study aimed to investigate if the Panda versions of these two pain scales are equivalent to the paper versions in adult patients.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, cross-over-controlled trial of subjects aged 19-75 yr undergoing procedures with anticipated post-surgical pain. Each subject used both the Panda and paper versions of VAS-100 or NRS-11 pain scores after emergence from anesthesia and after meeting postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria. Correlations between the two tools were analyzed, and Bland-Altman agreement was calculated. The smartphone and paper versions were considered equivalent at each time point if the differences (and their 95% confidence interval [CI]) between them were less than 20 points for the VAS-100 and 2.1 for NRS-11.ResultsThe two versions of the VAS-100 correlated strongly after emergence (Pearson's r=0.93; P<0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r=0.94; P<0.001); the mean (standard deviation [SD]) Panda score after emergence was 35 (27) compared with the paper score of 37 (26) (mean difference, -2; 95% CI, -22 to 19). The mean (SD) VAS-100 Panda score upon meeting discharge criteria was 21 (20) compared with the paper score of 23 (21) (mean difference, -2; 95% CI, -17 to 13). For the NRS-11, Panda again correlated strongly with the original tool scores after emergence (r=0.93; P<0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r=0.96; P<0.001); the mean (SD) Panda and paper scores after emergence were both 4 (3) (mean difference, 0.05; 95% CI, -1.87 to 1.96). The mean (SD) NRS-11 Panda and paper scores upon meeting PACU discharge criteria were both 3 (2) (mean difference, -0.08; 95% CI, -1.41 to 1.26).ConclusionFollowing emergence from anesthesia in adult patients, the digital Panda version of the NRS-11, but not the VAS-100, is equivalent to the validated paper version. In those who are ready for discharge from the PACU, the digital Panda versions of both the VAS-100 and NRS-11 agreed adequately and can be used in place of the original paper versions.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 715
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pain Relief Scale Is More Highly Correlated with Numerical Rating Scale than with Visual Analogue Scale in Chronic Pain Patients
    Lee, Jae Jin
    Lee, Mi Kyoung
    Kim, Jung Eun
    Kim, Hee Zoo
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Tae, Jong Hyun
    Choi, Sang Sik
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (02) : E195 - E200
  • [32] Reliability of Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale for the Assessment of Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Elera-Fitzcarrald, Claudia
    Vega, Karen
    Gamboa-Cardenas, Rocio V.
    Zuniga, Katiuska
    Zevallos, Francisco
    Reategui-Sokolova, Cristina
    Pastor-Asurza, Cesar
    Perich-Campos, Risto
    Rodriguez Bellido, Zoila
    Aranow, Cynthia
    Alarcon, Graciela S.
    Calvo, Armando
    Ugarte-Gil, Manuel F.
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 26 : S170 - S173
  • [33] The visual analogue thermometer and the graphic numeric rating scale: A comparison of self-report instruments for pain measurement in adults with burns
    de Jong, A. E. E.
    Bremer, M.
    Hofland, H. W. C.
    Schuurmans, M. J.
    Middelkoop, E.
    van Loey, N. E. E.
    BURNS, 2015, 41 (02) : 333 - 340
  • [34] Evaluation of the revised Faces Pain Scale, Verbal Descriptor Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Iowa Pain Thermometer in older minority adults
    Ware, Laurie Jowers
    Epps, Cynthia D.
    Herr, Keela
    Packard, Abbot
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2006, 7 (03) : 117 - 125
  • [35] A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain
    Modarresi, Shirin
    Lukacs, Michael J.
    Ghodrati, Maryam
    Salim, Shahan
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Walton, David M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 38 (02): : 132 - 148
  • [36] Good correlation between visual analogue scale and numerical rating scale in the assessment of nasal obstruction
    Haye, R.
    Dosen, L. K.
    Tarangen, M.
    Shiryaeva, O.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (04): : 327 - 328
  • [37] The effect of slider design and length on user performance and preference of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale
    Park, Seonghyeok
    Xiong, Shuping
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2021, 97
  • [38] The effect of slider design and length on user performance and preference of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale
    Park, Seonghyeok
    Xiong, Shuping
    Applied Ergonomics, 2021, 97
  • [39] Visual Analogue Scale: Evaluation of the Instrument for the Assessment of Pruritus
    Reich, Adam
    Heisig, Monika
    Ngoc Quan Phan
    Taneda, Kenichi
    Takamori, Kenji
    Takeuchi, Satoshi
    Furue, Masutaka
    Blome, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Szepietowski, Jacek C.
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2012, 92 (05) : 497 - 501
  • [40] The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain
    Shafshak, Tarek Saad
    Elnemr, Rehab
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 27 (07) : 282 - 285