The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Lily Y. L. [1 ]
Sun, Terri [1 ]
Ree, Ronald [1 ,2 ]
Dunsmuir, Dustin [1 ,3 ]
Dotto, Alexander [1 ,4 ]
Ansermino, J. Mark [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Yarnold, Cynthia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol & Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] St Pauls Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Providence Hlth Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] BC Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] BC Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Anesthesia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
INTENSITY; MANAGEMENT; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-019-01324-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposeThe Pain assessment using a novel digital application (Panda) is a smartphone application that contains the digital versions of the visual analogue scale (VAS-100) and numeric rating scale (NRS-11). This study aimed to investigate if the Panda versions of these two pain scales are equivalent to the paper versions in adult patients.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, cross-over-controlled trial of subjects aged 19-75 yr undergoing procedures with anticipated post-surgical pain. Each subject used both the Panda and paper versions of VAS-100 or NRS-11 pain scores after emergence from anesthesia and after meeting postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria. Correlations between the two tools were analyzed, and Bland-Altman agreement was calculated. The smartphone and paper versions were considered equivalent at each time point if the differences (and their 95% confidence interval [CI]) between them were less than 20 points for the VAS-100 and 2.1 for NRS-11.ResultsThe two versions of the VAS-100 correlated strongly after emergence (Pearson's r=0.93; P<0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r=0.94; P<0.001); the mean (standard deviation [SD]) Panda score after emergence was 35 (27) compared with the paper score of 37 (26) (mean difference, -2; 95% CI, -22 to 19). The mean (SD) VAS-100 Panda score upon meeting discharge criteria was 21 (20) compared with the paper score of 23 (21) (mean difference, -2; 95% CI, -17 to 13). For the NRS-11, Panda again correlated strongly with the original tool scores after emergence (r=0.93; P<0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r=0.96; P<0.001); the mean (SD) Panda and paper scores after emergence were both 4 (3) (mean difference, 0.05; 95% CI, -1.87 to 1.96). The mean (SD) NRS-11 Panda and paper scores upon meeting PACU discharge criteria were both 3 (2) (mean difference, -0.08; 95% CI, -1.41 to 1.26).ConclusionFollowing emergence from anesthesia in adult patients, the digital Panda version of the NRS-11, but not the VAS-100, is equivalent to the validated paper version. In those who are ready for discharge from the PACU, the digital Panda versions of both the VAS-100 and NRS-11 agreed adequately and can be used in place of the original paper versions.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 715
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Measuring pain intensity in older adults. Can the visual analogue scale and the numeric rating scale be used interchangeably?
    Bjelkaroy, Maria Torheim
    Benth, Jurate Saltyte
    Simonsen, Tone Breines
    Siddiqui, Tahreem Ghazal
    Cheng, Socheat
    Kristoffersen, Espen Saxhaug
    Lundqvist, Christofer
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 130
  • [12] Assessment of pruritus intensity: correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) in patients with chronic pruritus
    Phan, N. Q.
    Reich, A.
    Blome, C.
    Augustin, M.
    Szepietowski, J. C.
    Staender, S.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 19 (02) : 220 - 220
  • [13] The diagnostic value of the numeric pain rating scale in older postoperative patients
    van Dijk, Jacqueline F. M.
    Kappen, Teus H.
    van Wijck, Albert J. M.
    Kalkman, Cor J.
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2012, 21 (21-22) : 3018 - 3024
  • [14] RELIABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF VISUAL ANALOG SCALE AND NUMERIC RATING-SCALE FOR THERAPEUTIC EVALUATION OF PAIN IN RHEUMATIC PATIENTS
    JOOS, E
    PERETZ, A
    BEGUIN, S
    FAMAEY, JP
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1991, 18 (08) : 1269 - 1270
  • [15] Comparison of visual analog pain scale (VAPS) and verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) for pain assessment during labor analgesia
    Misa, VS
    Pan, PH
    Owen, MD
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (05) : A9 - A9
  • [16] UROLOGIC CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN ASSESSMENT USING THE NUMERIC RATING SCALE AND DEFENSE VETERANS RATING SCALE
    Shyr, William
    Aibel, Kelli
    Macdonald, Eric
    Huang, Karen
    Moldwin, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E194 - E194
  • [17] Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Maxwell, Lara J.
    Ostelo, Raymond W.
    Boers, Maarten
    Tugwell, Peter
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 20 (03): : 245 - 263
  • [18] A Comparison of Pain Assessment Measures in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Rating Scale
    Myrvik, Matthew P.
    Drendel, Amy L.
    Brandow, Amanda M.
    Yan, Ke
    Hoffmann, Raymond G.
    Panepinto, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 37 (03) : 190 - 194
  • [19] Validation of a visual analogue scale for the evaluation of the postoperative anxiety: A prospective observational study
    Labaste, Francois
    Ferre, Fabrice
    Combelles, Helene
    Rey, Valentin
    Foissac, Jean-Christophe
    Senechal, Anne
    Conil, Jean-Marie
    Minville, Vincent
    NURSING OPEN, 2019, 6 (04): : 1323 - 1330
  • [20] Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments
    Eriksson, Kerstin
    Wikstrom, Lotta
    Arestedt, Kristofer
    Fridlund, Bengt
    Brostrom, Anders
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (01) : 41 - 46