Transforming agroforestry in contested landscapes: A win-win solution to trade-offs in ecosystem services in Nepal

被引:21
|
作者
Aryal, Kishor [1 ,2 ]
Maraseni, Tek [1 ,3 ]
Apan, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Minist Ind Tourism Forests & Environm, Dhangadhi, Sudoorpaschim P, Nepal
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
Agroforestry; Ecosystem services; Integrated approach; Sustainable development goals; Trade-offs; LAND-USE; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; FARMING SYSTEM; SOIL FERTILITY; MIDDLE HILLS; SCALING-UP; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESOURCES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) is increasingly becoming a pressing issue in sustainability science, to deal with supply constraints of landscape and divergence in demand from local and global stakeholders. Agroforestry is a well acknowledged and established management practice to minimize the trade-offs, and to sustainably manage the contested landscapes while satisfying the growing demands of both local and global ecosystem beneficiaries. However, various facets of agroforestry, its management modality, institutional arrangements, and implementation outcomes are inadequately understood. This paper aims to scrutinize major agroforestry practices through the methods of systematic review of literature, government policies, and project reports. Taking a case of Nepal, this paper presents agroforestry transition from forest-based agroforestry (i.e., shifting cultivation) to farm-based integrated approach to agroforestry in Nepal. This paper reveals that integrated agro-forestry approach is crucial in creating win-win scenarios among various stakeholders by minimizing trade-offs and maximizing synergies among ES, especially food, fibre, and other ES (i.e., biodiversity, soil functioning, water, and climate regulation). Analysing socio-economic, ecological, and institutional factors that are affecting agroforestry for the last fifty years, we further suggest an integrated model of agroforestry which is replicable in other countries with similar socio-economic status, practicing subsistence farming system. The findings of the paper are crucial in awakening scholars, policy makers and landscape managers for up-scaling and out-scaling of integrated approach to agroforestry for ecosystem management and attainment of various sustainable development goals such as, no poverty (#1), zero hunger (#2), climate action (#13), and life on land (#15).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR HUMAN WELLBEING Trade-offs and governance
    Mace, Georgina
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    Poudyal, Mahesh
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 305 - 316
  • [42] Analyzing Farmers' Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and PES Schemes within Agricultural Landscapes in Mengyin County, China: Transforming Trade-Offs into Synergies
    Chen, Yajuan
    Zhang, Qian
    Liu, Wenping
    Yu, Zhenrong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [43] The trade-offs of win–win conservation rhetoric: exploring place meanings in community conservation on the Wild Coast, South Africa
    Vanessa A. Masterson
    Marja Spierenburg
    Maria Tengö
    Sustainability Science, 2019, 14 : 639 - 654
  • [44] The importance of seeking a win-win solution in shaping the vegetation of military heritage landscapes: The role of legibility, naturalness and user preference
    Pardela, Lukasz
    Lis, Aleksandra
    Iwankowski, Pawel
    Wilkaniec, Agnieszka
    Theile, Markus
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2022, 221
  • [45] Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Torralba, Mario
    Hartel, Tibor
    Fagerholm, Nora
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) : 1565 - 1581
  • [46] Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes-A review of synergies and trade-offs
    Winberg, Josefin
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Ekroos, Johan
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2023, 15 (10): : 1204 - 1220
  • [47] Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes-A review of synergies and trade-offs
    Winberg, Josefin
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Ekroos, Johan
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2023,
  • [48] Ecosystem services trade-offs in landscapes: trends, areas of greatest impact, and temporal evolution of the scientific field
    Lukas Q. Chicago
    Cristian Echeverría
    Cristóbal J. Pizarro
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 2225 - 2239
  • [49] Ecosystem services trade-offs in landscapes: trends, areas of greatest impact, and temporal evolution of the scientific field
    Chicago, Lukas Q.
    Echeverria, Cristian
    Pizarro, Cristobal J.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (09) : 2225 - 2239
  • [50] Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
    Tobias Plieninger
    Mario Torralba
    Tibor Hartel
    Nora Fagerholm
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1565 - 1581