Transforming agroforestry in contested landscapes: A win-win solution to trade-offs in ecosystem services in Nepal

被引:21
|
作者
Aryal, Kishor [1 ,2 ]
Maraseni, Tek [1 ,3 ]
Apan, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Minist Ind Tourism Forests & Environm, Dhangadhi, Sudoorpaschim P, Nepal
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
Agroforestry; Ecosystem services; Integrated approach; Sustainable development goals; Trade-offs; LAND-USE; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; FARMING SYSTEM; SOIL FERTILITY; MIDDLE HILLS; SCALING-UP; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESOURCES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) is increasingly becoming a pressing issue in sustainability science, to deal with supply constraints of landscape and divergence in demand from local and global stakeholders. Agroforestry is a well acknowledged and established management practice to minimize the trade-offs, and to sustainably manage the contested landscapes while satisfying the growing demands of both local and global ecosystem beneficiaries. However, various facets of agroforestry, its management modality, institutional arrangements, and implementation outcomes are inadequately understood. This paper aims to scrutinize major agroforestry practices through the methods of systematic review of literature, government policies, and project reports. Taking a case of Nepal, this paper presents agroforestry transition from forest-based agroforestry (i.e., shifting cultivation) to farm-based integrated approach to agroforestry in Nepal. This paper reveals that integrated agro-forestry approach is crucial in creating win-win scenarios among various stakeholders by minimizing trade-offs and maximizing synergies among ES, especially food, fibre, and other ES (i.e., biodiversity, soil functioning, water, and climate regulation). Analysing socio-economic, ecological, and institutional factors that are affecting agroforestry for the last fifty years, we further suggest an integrated model of agroforestry which is replicable in other countries with similar socio-economic status, practicing subsistence farming system. The findings of the paper are crucial in awakening scholars, policy makers and landscape managers for up-scaling and out-scaling of integrated approach to agroforestry for ecosystem management and attainment of various sustainable development goals such as, no poverty (#1), zero hunger (#2), climate action (#13), and life on land (#15).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
    Albert, Christian
    Hermes, Johannes
    Neuendorf, Felix
    von Haaren, Christina
    Rode, Michael
    LAND, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [22] Identifying 'win-win-win' futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Rich, Karl M.
    Shankar, Bhavani
    Rana, Vinay
    Ratna, Nazmun N.
    Kadiyala, Suneetha
    Alam, Mohammad J.
    Nadagouda, Sharan B.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 190
  • [23] To Achieve a Win-Win Situation: Reorganizing and Enhancing Agroforestry Ecosystem Assets and Productivity to Inform Karst Desertification Control
    Huang, Yunting
    Xiong, Kangning
    Xiao, Jie
    FORESTS, 2024, 15 (03):
  • [24] Trade-offs between crop intensification and ecosystem services: the role of agroforestry in cocoa cultivation
    Vaast, Philippe
    Somarriba, Eduardo
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2014, 88 (06) : 947 - 956
  • [25] Trade-offs between crop intensification and ecosystem services: the role of agroforestry in cocoa cultivation
    Philippe Vaast
    Eduardo Somarriba
    Agroforestry Systems, 2014, 88 : 947 - 956
  • [26] Conservation and livelihoods: identifying trade-offs and win-wins
    Fisher, Brendan P.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (07) : 343 - 343
  • [27] Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for 'win-win'?
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Farley, Kathleen A.
    Lopez-Carr, David
    Romero, Jose
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 : 148 - 165
  • [28] Identifying win–win situations in agricultural landscapes: an integrated ecosystem services assessment for Spain
    F. Santos-Martín
    P. Zorrilla-Miras
    M. García-Llorente
    C. Quintas-Soriano
    C. Montes
    J. Benayas
    A. Gómez Sal
    M. L. Paracchini
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1789 - 1805
  • [29] Combining Multifunctionality and Ecosystem Services into a Win-Win Solution. The Case Study of the Serchio River Basin (Tuscany-Italy)
    Rovai, Massimo
    Andreoli, Maria
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [30] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146