Transforming agroforestry in contested landscapes: A win-win solution to trade-offs in ecosystem services in Nepal

被引:21
|
作者
Aryal, Kishor [1 ,2 ]
Maraseni, Tek [1 ,3 ]
Apan, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Minist Ind Tourism Forests & Environm, Dhangadhi, Sudoorpaschim P, Nepal
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
Agroforestry; Ecosystem services; Integrated approach; Sustainable development goals; Trade-offs; LAND-USE; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; FARMING SYSTEM; SOIL FERTILITY; MIDDLE HILLS; SCALING-UP; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESOURCES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) is increasingly becoming a pressing issue in sustainability science, to deal with supply constraints of landscape and divergence in demand from local and global stakeholders. Agroforestry is a well acknowledged and established management practice to minimize the trade-offs, and to sustainably manage the contested landscapes while satisfying the growing demands of both local and global ecosystem beneficiaries. However, various facets of agroforestry, its management modality, institutional arrangements, and implementation outcomes are inadequately understood. This paper aims to scrutinize major agroforestry practices through the methods of systematic review of literature, government policies, and project reports. Taking a case of Nepal, this paper presents agroforestry transition from forest-based agroforestry (i.e., shifting cultivation) to farm-based integrated approach to agroforestry in Nepal. This paper reveals that integrated agro-forestry approach is crucial in creating win-win scenarios among various stakeholders by minimizing trade-offs and maximizing synergies among ES, especially food, fibre, and other ES (i.e., biodiversity, soil functioning, water, and climate regulation). Analysing socio-economic, ecological, and institutional factors that are affecting agroforestry for the last fifty years, we further suggest an integrated model of agroforestry which is replicable in other countries with similar socio-economic status, practicing subsistence farming system. The findings of the paper are crucial in awakening scholars, policy makers and landscape managers for up-scaling and out-scaling of integrated approach to agroforestry for ecosystem management and attainment of various sustainable development goals such as, no poverty (#1), zero hunger (#2), climate action (#13), and life on land (#15).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coordinating ecosystem service trade-offs to achieve win-win outcomes: A review of the approaches
    Zheng, Hua
    Wang, Lijuan
    Wu, Tong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2019, 82 : 103 - 112
  • [2] YELLOWSTONE ECOSYSTEM - WIN-WIN SOLUTION
    ALPER, J
    SCIENCE, 1992, 255 (5045) : 685 - 686
  • [3] Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs
    Phelps, J.
    Friess, D. A.
    Webb, E. L.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 154 : 53 - 60
  • [4] Increasing landscape heterogeneity as a win-win solution to manage trade-offs in biological control of crop and woodland pests
    Tortosa, Axelle
    Giffard, Brice
    Sirami, Clelia
    Larrieu, Laurent
    Ladet, Sylvie
    Vialatte, Aude
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [5] Agroforestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis
    Shem Kuyah
    Cory W. Whitney
    Mattias Jonsson
    Gudeta W. Sileshi
    Ingrid Öborn
    Catherine W. Muthuri
    Eike Luedeling
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2019, 39
  • [6] Agroforestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis
    Kuyah, Shem
    Whitney, Cory W.
    Jonsson, Mattias
    Sileshi, Gudeta W.
    Oborn, Ingrid
    Muthuri, Catherine W.
    Luedeling, Eike
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 39 (05)
  • [7] Coordinating ecosystem service trade-offs to achieve win–win outcomes: A review of the approaches
    Hua Zheng
    Lijuan Wang
    Tong Wu
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 82 (08) : 103 - 112
  • [8] Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade-Offs Into Win-Win Outcomes
    Beckmann, Markus
    Hielscher, Stefan
    Pies, Ingo
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (01) : 18 - 37
  • [9] Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions
    Muradian, R.
    Arsel, M.
    Pellegrini, L.
    Adaman, F.
    Aguilar, B.
    Agarwal, B.
    Corbera, E.
    de Blas, D. Ezzine
    Farley, J.
    Froger, G.
    Garcia-Frapolli, E.
    Gomez-Baggethun, E.
    Gowdy, J.
    Kosoy, N.
    Le Coq, J. F.
    Leroy, P.
    May, P.
    Meral, P.
    Mibielli, P.
    Norgaard, R.
    Ozkaynak, B.
    Pascual, U.
    Pengue, W.
    Perez, M.
    Pesche, D.
    Pirard, R.
    Ramos-Martin, J.
    Rival, L.
    Saenz, F.
    Van Hecken, G.
    Vatn, A.
    Vira, B.
    Urama, K.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2013, 6 (04): : 274 - 279
  • [10] Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes
    Rolo, Victor
    V. Roces-Diaz, Jose
    Torralba, Mario
    Kay, Sonja
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Aviron, Stephanie
    Burgess, Paul
    Crous-Duran, Josep
    Ferreiro-Dominguez, Nuria
    Graves, Anil
    Hartel, Tibor
    Mantzanas, Konstantinos
    Mosquera-Losada, Maria Rosa
    Palma, Joao H. N.
    Sidiropoulou, Anna
    Szerencsits, Erich
    Viaud, Valerie
    Herzog, Felix
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Moreno, Gerardo
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50