Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sun, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Dongying [1 ]
Wang, Qiuan [1 ]
Wei, Yangyang [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
C-arm; Freehand technique; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw; Spinal surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FLUOROSCOPY; LUMBAR; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; SURGEON;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi(2) test and I-2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I-2 = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I-2 indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E99
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative efficacy of robotic-assisted and freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement in spinal disorders: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Yang, Zhanhua
    Sun, Yuhang
    Deng, Changcui
    Dong, Xiuhui
    Hao, Liansheng
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [32] Robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery - a systematic review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Yu, Lingjia
    Chen, Xi
    Margalit, Adam
    Peng, Huiming
    Qiu, Guixing
    Qian, Wenwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03):
  • [33] Meta-analysis of fluoroscopic and navigation-based cervical pedicle screw placement
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Khan, Asham
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (03) : 522 - 523
  • [34] Letter to the Editor Regarding ?Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 3 Image -Guided Navigation Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta -Analysis ?
    Umana, Giuseppe Emmanuele
    Passanisi, Maurizio
    Fricia, Marco
    Chiriatti, Stefano
    Fagone, Saverio
    Cicero, Salvatore
    Nicoletti, Giovanni Federico
    Scalia, Gianluca
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 138 : 595 - 597
  • [35] Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Wei
    Liu, Xinglin
    Zhao, Zhiheng
    Feng, Zihe
    Meng, Xianglong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [36] Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using freehand fluoroscopic, navigation, and robotic-assisted techniques - a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
    Lajczak, Pawel
    Ayesha, Ayesha
    Jabbar, Rabbia
    Silva, Yasmin Picanco
    Sharma, Eshita
    Sahin, Oguz Kagan
    Lobo, Kaike Eduardo da Silva
    Petry, Iago Nathan Simon
    Ahmed, Aisha Rizwan
    Rocha, Fabio Victor Vieira
    Fagundes, Walter
    Silva, Yan G. M. D.
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [37] Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis
    Nai-Feng Tian
    Hua-Zi Xu
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 895 - 903
  • [38] Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (04) : 895 - 903
  • [39] Comment on “Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation” by S. Chachan et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5585-1)
    R. Cecchinato
    C. Lamartina
    European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 2737 - 2737
  • [40] Can the cortical bone trajectory screw technique be an alternative method to the pedicle screw in posterior lumbar fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kun-Tae
    Song, Myung-Geun
    Lee, Eun-Chang
    Seo, Min-Seok
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Kim, DongHee
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2021, 55 (06) : 552 - 562