Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sun, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Dongying [1 ]
Wang, Qiuan [1 ]
Wei, Yangyang [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
C-arm; Freehand technique; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw; Spinal surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FLUOROSCOPY; LUMBAR; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; SURGEON;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi(2) test and I-2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I-2 = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I-2 indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E99
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Letter to the editor regarding “O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
    Yanyun Gu
    Chunyan Yang
    International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45 : 309 - 309
  • [22] Pedicle Screw Revision in Robot-Guided, Navigated, and Freehand Thoracolumbar Instrumentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Staartjes, Victor E.
    Klukowska, Anita M.
    Schroder, Marc L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : 433 - +
  • [23] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Accuracy and Clinical Outcome of Pedicle Screw Placement Using Robot-Assisted Technology and Conventional Freehand Technique
    Tarawneh, Ahmad M.
    Salem, Khalid MI.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (04) : 575 - 586
  • [24] Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    Huang, Qi-Shan
    Zhou, Ping
    Zhou, Yang
    Wu, Rui-Kai
    Lou, Yi
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (06) : 846 - 859
  • [25] Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Nai-Feng Tian
    Qi-Shan Huang
    Ping Zhou
    Yang Zhou
    Rui-Kai Wu
    Yi Lou
    Hua-Zi Xu
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 846 - 859
  • [26] Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Peng, Yu-Ning
    Tsai, Li-Cheng
    Hsu, Horng-Chaung
    Kao, Chia-Hung
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (13)
  • [27] Robotic Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Approach in Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, T. K.
    Tan, J. Y.
    Ng, K. T.
    Ahuja, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [28] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Parameters in Robot-Guided, Navigated, and Freehand Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation
    Siccoli, Alessandro
    Klukowska, Anita M.
    Schroder, Marc L.
    Staartjes, Victor E.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : 576 - +
  • [29] Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Naik, Anant
    Smith, Alexander D.
    Shaffer, Annabelle
    Krist, David T.
    Moawad, Christina M.
    MacInnis, Bailey R.
    Teal, Kevin
    Hassaneen, Wael
    Arnold, Paul M.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2022, 52 (01)
  • [30] The comparative accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic and navigation-based techniques in cervical pedicle screw fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tarawneh, Ahmad M.
    Haleem, Shahnawaz
    D'Aquino, Daniel
    Quraishi, Nasir
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 194 - 201