Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil - A prospective randomized study

被引:1
|
作者
Ahsan, N
Hricik, D
Matas, A
Rose, S
Tomlanovich, S
Wilkinson, A
Ewell, M
McIntosh, M
Stablein, D
Hodge, E
Hayes, D
Gores, P
Cohen, D
Gonwa, T
Brinler, K
Harland, R
Neylan, J
Pescovitz, M
Wynn, J
Ahsan, N
Yang, HC
Bennett, W
Copley, J
Wilkinson, A
Dunn, J
Tomlanovich, S
Chan, L
Bertolatus, JA
Weir, M
Mendez, R
Pirsch, J
Helderman, JH
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Hershey, PA USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] NIAID, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] Roche Labs, Nutley, NJ USA
[8] Carolinas Med Ctr, Charlotte, NC USA
[9] Columbia Presbyterian Univ, New York, NY USA
[10] Dallas Nephrol, Dallas, TX USA
[11] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[12] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[13] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[14] Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[15] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[16] Alton Ochsner Med Fdn & Ochsner Clin, New Orleans, LA 70121 USA
[17] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[18] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[19] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[20] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[21] Univ Maryland Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[22] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[23] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[24] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Prospective randomized trials have shown a reduced rate of acute rejection (AR) in mycophenolate mofetil-treated kidney transplant recipients. We hypothesized that this increased protection from AR could allow successful prednisone (P) withdrawal in cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P-treated recipients. Methods. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of P withdrawal at 3 months posttransplant was initiated. Entry criteria were: primary transplant, adult, no AR by 90 days, mycophenolate mofetil dose greater than or equal to 2 g/day, cyclosporine dose=5-15 mg/kg/day, P dose=10-15 mg/day, Study participants were randomized to have P tapered over 8 weeks (beginning at 3 months posttransplant) to 0 vs. 10 mg/day, Prestudy power analysis determined 500 recipients should be randomized for 80% statistical power to test equivalence of the primary endpoint, AR, or treatment failure at 1 year posttransplant, By design, the study was to be stopped if interim data precluded reaching equivalence. An established data safety monitoring board monitored the study. Results, After 266 patients were enrolled, the patient enrollment was stopped (after safety monitoring board review) because of excess rejection in the P withdrawal group, The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative incidence of rejection or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant (+/-95% confidence interval) for the maintenance group was 9.8% (4.4%; treatment failure, 14.9%); for the withdrawal group, 30.8% (21.0%; 39.3%). Treatment differences in the distribution of time to event were highly significant (P=0.0007). Of note, risk was higher in blacks (39.6%) versus nonblacks (16.0%) (P<0.001). At 1 year posttransplant, there was no difference between groups in patient or graft survival, For the patients with functioning grafts at 6 months posttransplant, withdrawal patients had lower cholesterol (P=0.0005), had higher creatinine (P=0.03), and were less likely to use antihypertensives (P=0.001). These differences persist to 1 yr posttransplant. Conclusions. We conclude that for recipients on cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P with no AR at 90 days, the chance of developing subsequent AR is small; if P is tapered and withdrawn, the risk increases (but the majority remain free of acute and chronic rejection). After withdrawal, the risk of AR is different for blacks versus nonblacks, Withdrawal patients had a lower cholesterol level and less need for antihypertensives.
引用
收藏
页码:1865 / 1874
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone and tacrolimus
    Daoud, AJ
    Schroeder, TJ
    Shah, M
    Hariharan, S
    Peddi, VR
    Weiskittel, P
    First, MR
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (08) : 4079 - 4081
  • [22] Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine
    Fabrega, AJ
    Corwin, CL
    Hunsicker, L
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (04) : 1562 - 1563
  • [23] Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine
    Lobritto, Steven J.
    Rosenthal, Philip
    Bouw, Rene
    Leung, Mimi
    Snell, Paul
    Mamelok, Richard D.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 13 (11) : 1570 - 1575
  • [24] Prospective, randomised, multicentre trial on late steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients under cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil
    Weber, L. T.
    Hoecker, B.
    Feneberg, R.
    Drube, J.
    John, U.
    Fehrenbach, H.
    Pohl, M.
    Zimmering, M.
    Fruend, S.
    Klaus, G.
    Wuehl, E.
    Toenshoff, B.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 23 (09) : 1679 - 1679
  • [25] A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C
    Jain, A
    Kashyap, R
    Demetris, AJ
    Eghstesad, B
    Pokharna, R
    Fung, JJ
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [26] Use of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients experiencing renal dysfunction on cyclosporine or tacrolimus-randomized, prospective, multicenter study results
    Hodge, EE
    Reich, DJ
    Clavien, PA
    Kim-Schluger, L
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1546 - 1547
  • [27] Withdrawal of Mycophenolate Mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients.
    Meier-Kriesche, HU
    Kaza, H
    Thambuganipalle, R
    Vaghela, M
    Jacobs, HG
    Mulgaonkar, SP
    Friedman, GS
    Kaplan, B
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S132 - S132
  • [28] Mycophenolate mofetil levels in stable kidney transplant recipients
    Fernandez, A.
    Marcen, R.
    Pascual, J.
    Martins, J.
    Villafruela, J. J.
    Cano, T.
    Sabater, J.
    Puig, C.
    Gil-Casares, B.
    Muriel, A.
    Burgos, J.
    Ortuna, J.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) : 2182 - 2184
  • [29] The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in Thai kidney transplant recipients
    Jirasiritham, S
    Sumethkul, V
    Mavichak, V
    Na-Bangchang, K
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (07) : 2076 - 2078
  • [30] Predictive factors of acute rejection after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients who receive mycophenolate mofetil:: Results from a prospective, randomized trial
    Hazzan, M
    Labalette, M
    Copin, MC
    Glowacki, F
    Provôt, F
    Pruv, FR
    Noël, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (08): : 2509 - 2516