Predictive factors of acute rejection after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients who receive mycophenolate mofetil:: Results from a prospective, randomized trial

被引:59
|
作者
Hazzan, M
Labalette, M
Copin, MC
Glowacki, F
Provôt, F
Pruv, FR
Noël, C
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Lille, Dept Nephrol, Lille, France
[2] Reg Hosp Lille, Dept Immunol, Lille, France
[3] Reg Hosp Lille, Dept Pathol, Lille, France
[4] Reg Hosp Lille, Dept Surg, Lille, France
[5] Reg Hosp Lille, Transplant Unit, Lille, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1681/ASN.2005030312
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this randomized, open-labeled trial was to compare the incidence of acute rejection after an early (3 mo posttransplantation) withdrawal of cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophertolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplantation. Among 218 eligible recipients, 108 nonsensitized, rejection-free patients who were under a triple drug regimen (CsA-MMF-prednisone) and had received a first kidney from a deceased donor were enrolled. At 3 mo after graft, they were gradually withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n = 54) or MMF (CsA group, n = 54). A graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of CsA and mycophenolic acid were systematically performed before the randomization. At 1 yr, graft and patient survival rates were 100% in each group. Renal function was improved in the MMF group compared with the CsA group (Cockcroft calculated clearance 64.7 +/- 18.7 versus 56.5 +/- 18.0 ml/min; P = 0.023). However, the probability of acute rejection was higher in the MMF group (18.5 versus 5.6%; P = 0.045). The 10 patients who developed acute rejection after CsA withdrawal had a significantly higher incidence of borderline changes on the randomization biopsy than the 44 rejection-free patients (five of 10 versus eight of 44; P = 0.034), and they displayed a lower area under the curve of mycophenolic acid (43 +/- 9 versus 58 +/- 22 mg/h per L; P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis confirmed that borderline changes and area under the curve of mycophenolic acid were significant risk factors of acute rejection after CsA discontinuation. It is concluded that a systematic graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolic acid are needed to reduce the risk for acute rejection after CsA withdrawal.
引用
收藏
页码:2509 / 2516
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective, Randomized Trial on Late Steroid Withdrawal in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients Under Cyclosporine Microemulsion and Mycophenolate Mofetil
    Hoecker, Britta
    Weber, Lutz T.
    Feneberg, Reinhard
    Drube, Jens
    John, Ulrike
    Fehrenbach, Henry
    Pohl, Martin
    Zimmering, Miriam
    Fruend, Stefan
    Klaus, Guenter
    Wuehl, Elke
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (06) : 934 - 941
  • [2] Multicenter randomized prospective trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil
    Vincenti, F
    Monaco, A
    Grinyo, J
    Kinkhabwala, M
    Roza, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [3] Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil - A prospective randomized study
    Ahsan, N
    Hricik, D
    Matas, A
    Rose, S
    Tomlanovich, S
    Wilkinson, A
    Ewell, M
    McIntosh, M
    Stablein, D
    Hodge, E
    Hayes, D
    Gores, P
    Cohen, D
    Gonwa, T
    Brinler, K
    Harland, R
    Neylan, J
    Pescovitz, M
    Wynn, J
    Ahsan, N
    Yang, HC
    Bennett, W
    Copley, J
    Wilkinson, A
    Dunn, J
    Tomlanovich, S
    Chan, L
    Bertolatus, JA
    Weir, M
    Mendez, R
    Pirsch, J
    Helderman, JH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (12) : 1865 - 1874
  • [4] Prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in kidney recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine
    Pelletier, RP
    Akin, B
    Ferguson, RM
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 20 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [5] Early steroid withdrawal protocol with basiliximab, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal-transplant recipients
    Kato, Yojiro
    Tojimbara, Tamotsu
    Iwadoh, Kazuhiro
    Koyama, Ichiro
    Nanmoku, Koji
    Kai, Kotaro
    Sannomiya, Akihito
    Nakajima, Ichiro
    Fuchinoue, Shohei
    Teraoka, Satoshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 6 (13-14) : 1984 - 1992
  • [6] Cyclosporine withdrawal in stable renal transplant recipients after azathioprine-mycophenolate mofetil conversion
    Thervet, E
    Morelon, E
    Ducloux, D
    Bererhi, L
    Noël, LH
    Bedrossian, JJ
    Puget, S
    Chalopin, JM
    Mihatsch, M
    Legendre, C
    Kreis, H
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 14 (06) : 561 - 566
  • [7] Prospective, randomised, multicentre trial on late steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients under cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil
    Weber, L. T.
    Hoecker, B.
    Feneberg, R.
    Drube, J.
    John, U.
    Fehrenbach, H.
    Pohl, M.
    Zimmering, M.
    Fruend, S.
    Klaus, G.
    Wuehl, E.
    Toenshoff, B.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 23 (09) : 1679 - 1679
  • [8] Mycophenolate mofetil for renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine or tacrolimus: Randomized, prospective, multicenter pilot study results
    Reich, DJ
    Clavien, PA
    Hodge, EE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [9] Open randomized trial comparing early withdrawal of either cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients initially treated with a triple drug regimen
    Schnuelle, P
    Van der Heide, JH
    Tegzess, A
    Verburgh, CA
    Paul, LC
    Van der Woude, FJ
    De Fijter, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (02): : 536 - 543
  • [10] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function
    Liu, B
    Lin, ZB
    Ming, CS
    Zhang, WJ
    Chen, ZS
    Sha, B
    Zeng, FJ
    Chen, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 87 - 88