Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices

被引:33
|
作者
Zhou, L. [1 ]
Lund, M. S. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Su, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Agr Anim Genet & Breeding, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Genomic selection; multibreed; marker-based relationship matrix; linkage disequilibrium phase consistence; DAIRY-CATTLE BREEDS; MULTI-BREED; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12089
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study investigated genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using various genomic relationship matrices. Different sources of information, such as consistencies of linkage disequilibrium (LD) phase and marker effects, were used to construct the genomic relationship matrices (G-matrices) across these two breeds. Single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model and two-trait GBLUP model were used for single-breed and two-breed genomic predictions. The data included 5215 Nordic Holstein bulls and 4361 Nordic Red bulls, which was composed of three populations: Danish Red, Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. The bulls were genotyped with 50 000 SNP chip. Using the two-breed predictions with a joint Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red reference population, accuracies increased slightly for all traits in Nordic Red, but only for some traits in Nordic Holstein. Among the three subpopulations of Nordic Red, accuracies increased more for Danish Red than for Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. This is because closer genetic relationships exist between Danish Red and Nordic Holstein. Among Danish Red, individuals with higher genomic relationship coefficients with Nordic Holstein showed more increased accuracies in the two-breed predictions. Weighting the two-breed G-matrices by LD phase consistencies, marker effects or both did not further improve accuracies of the two-breed predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information
    Selma Forni
    Ignacio Aguilar
    Ignacy Misztal
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 43
  • [42] Genomic Prediction for Complex Traits Following Feature Selection: Results from Bayes C and Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP)
    Bermingham, Mairead
    Pong-Wong, Ricardo
    Spiliopoulou, Athina
    Hayward, Caroline
    Rudan, Igor
    Campbell, Harry
    Wright, Alan
    Wilson, James
    Agakov, Felix
    Navarro, Pau
    Haley, Chris
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2013, 76 (02) : 89 - 90
  • [43] Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information
    Forni, Selma
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Misztal, Ignacy
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
  • [44] The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (11) : 4532 - 4542
  • [45] Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models
    Stranden, I.
    Matilainen, K.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [46] Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
    Ober, Ulrike
    Erbe, Malena
    Long, Nanye
    Porcu, Emilio
    Schlather, Martin
    Simianer, Henner
    GENETICS, 2011, 188 (03) : 695 - 708
  • [47] Multi-Trait, Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction of Durum Wheat With Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor and Deep Learning Methods
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Tuberosa, Roberto
    Maccaferri, Marco
    Sciara, Giuseppe
    Ammar, Karim
    Crossa, Jose
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [48] SLEMM: Million-scale genomic best linear unbiased predictions with window-based SNP weighting
    Cheng, J.
    Maltecca, C.
    Vanraden, P.
    O'Connell, J.
    Ma, L.
    Jiang, J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 19 - 19
  • [49] Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes
    Nielsen, H. M.
    Sonesson, A. K.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [50] The impact of truncating data on the predictive ability for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (04) : 251 - 262