Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices

被引:33
|
作者
Zhou, L. [1 ]
Lund, M. S. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Su, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Agr Anim Genet & Breeding, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Genomic selection; multibreed; marker-based relationship matrix; linkage disequilibrium phase consistence; DAIRY-CATTLE BREEDS; MULTI-BREED; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12089
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study investigated genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using various genomic relationship matrices. Different sources of information, such as consistencies of linkage disequilibrium (LD) phase and marker effects, were used to construct the genomic relationship matrices (G-matrices) across these two breeds. Single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model and two-trait GBLUP model were used for single-breed and two-breed genomic predictions. The data included 5215 Nordic Holstein bulls and 4361 Nordic Red bulls, which was composed of three populations: Danish Red, Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. The bulls were genotyped with 50 000 SNP chip. Using the two-breed predictions with a joint Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red reference population, accuracies increased slightly for all traits in Nordic Red, but only for some traits in Nordic Holstein. Among the three subpopulations of Nordic Red, accuracies increased more for Danish Red than for Swedish Red and Finnish Ayrshire. This is because closer genetic relationships exist between Danish Red and Nordic Holstein. Among Danish Red, individuals with higher genomic relationship coefficients with Nordic Holstein showed more increased accuracies in the two-breed predictions. Weighting the two-breed G-matrices by LD phase consistencies, marker effects or both did not further improve accuracies of the two-breed predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Chen, C. Y.
    Herring, W. O.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (03) : 909 - 919
  • [22] Predictive ability of Random Forests, Boosting, Support Vector Machines and Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in different scenarios of genomic evaluation
    Ghafouri-Kesbi, Farhad
    Rahimi-Mianji, Ghodratollah
    Honarvar, Mahmood
    Nejati-Javaremi, Ardeshir
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (02) : 229 - 236
  • [23] Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population
    Gao, H.
    Madsen, P.
    Nielsen, U. S.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Su, G.
    Byskov, K.
    Jensen, J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (12) : 9051 - 9059
  • [24] Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle
    Lopez, Bryan Irvine
    Lee, Seung-Hwan
    Park, Jong-Eun
    Shin, Dong-Hyun
    Oh, Jae-Don
    de las Heras-Saldana, Sara
    van der Werf, Julius
    Chai, Han-Ha
    Park, Woncheoul
    Lim, Dajeong
    GENES, 2019, 10 (12)
  • [25] Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium
    Nishio, M.
    Satoh, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2015, 132 (05) : 357 - 365
  • [26] Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances
    Su, G.
    Christensen, O. F.
    Janss, L.
    Lund, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (10) : 6547 - 6559
  • [27] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Gao, Hongding
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Nielsen, Ulrik S.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [28] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Hongding Gao
    Ole F Christensen
    Per Madsen
    Ulrik S Nielsen
    Yuan Zhang
    Mogens S Lund
    Guosheng Su
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 44
  • [29] Accuracy of genomic breeding value prediction for intramuscular fat using different genomic relationship matrices in Hanwoo (Korean cattle)
    Choi, Taejeong
    Lim, Dajeong
    Park, Byoungho
    Sharma, Aditi
    Kim, Jong-Joo
    Kim, Sidong
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (07): : 907 - 911
  • [30] Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Rostam
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Misztal, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (09)