Comparison of separation performance of independent component analysis algorithms for fMRI data

被引:3
|
作者
Sariya, Yogesh Kumar [1 ]
Anand, R. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Instrumentat & Signal Proc Grp, Dept Elect Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Brain; blood oxygenation level dependent signals; blind source separation; spatial sorting; temporal sorting; mutual information; resting state networks; STATE FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY; MRI; TOOLBOX; NETWORK; ICA;
D O I
10.3233/JIN-170006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Independent component analysis, a data-driven analysis method, has found significant applications in task-based as well as resting state fMRI studies. There are numbers of independent component analysis algorithms available, but only a few of them have been used frequently so far for fMRI images. With a view that algorithms that are overlooked may outperform the most opted, a comparative study is taken up in this paper to analyze their abilities for the purpose of synthesis of fMRI images. In this paper, ten independent component algorithms: Fast ICA, INFOMAX, SIMBEC, JADE, ERICA, EVD, RADICAL, ICA-EBM, ERBM, and COMBI are compared. Their separation abilities are adjudged on both, synthetic and real fMRI images. Performance to decompose synthetic fMRI images is being monitored on the basis of spatial correlation coefficients, time elapsed to extract independent components and the visual appearance of independent components. Ranking of their performances on task-based real fMRI images are based on the closeness of time courses of identified independent components with model time course and the closeness of spatial maps of components with spatial templates while their competencies for resting state fMRI data are analyzed by examining how distinctly they decompose the data into the most consistent resting state networks. Sum of mutual information between all the permutations of decomposed components of resting state fMRI data are also calculated.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 175
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Independent Component Analysis algorithms for EEG-fMRI data fusion
    Youssofzadeh, Vahab
    Faye, Ibrahima
    Malik, Aamir Saeed
    Reza, Faruque
    Kamel, Nidal
    Abdullah, Jafri Malin
    [J]. 2012 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AND ADVANCED SYSTEMS (ICIAS), VOLS 1-2, 2012, : 676 - 679
  • [2] Independent component analysis of fMRI data: a model based approach for artifacts separation
    Vanello, N
    Positano, V
    Ricciardi, E
    Santarelli, MF
    Guazzelli, M
    Pietrini, P
    Landini, L
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING 2003, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 529 - 532
  • [3] Independent Component Analysis for EEG Data Preprocessing - Algorithms Comparison
    Rejer, Izabela
    Gorski, Pawel
    [J]. COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, CISIM 2013, 2013, 8104 : 108 - 119
  • [4] Analysis of fMRI Data by Blind Separation of Data in a Tiny Spatial Domain into Independent Temporal Component
    Huafu Chen
    Dezhong Yao
    Yan Zhuo
    Lin Chen
    [J]. Brain Topography, 2003, 15 : 223 - 232
  • [5] Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation of data in a tiny spatial domain into independent temporal component
    Chen, HF
    Yao, DH
    Zhuo, Y
    Chen, L
    [J]. BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2003, 15 (04) : 223 - 232
  • [6] Independent component analysis of fMRI data: Examining the assumptions
    McKeown, MJ
    Sejnowski, TJ
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1998, 6 (5-6) : 368 - 372
  • [7] Independent component analysis of fMRI data in the complex domain
    Calhoun, VD
    Adali, T
    Pearlson, GD
    van Zijl, PCM
    Pekar, JJ
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 48 (01) : 180 - 192
  • [8] Independent component analysis algorithms for microarray data analysis
    Malutan, Raul
    Gomez Vilda, Pedro
    Borda, Monica
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2010, 14 (02) : 193 - 206
  • [9] Performance comparison of independent component analysis algorithms for fetal cardiac signal reconstruction: a study on synthetic fMCG data
    Mantini, D
    Hild, KE
    Alleva, G
    Comani, S
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (04): : 1033 - 1046
  • [10] Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: Unsupervised clustering versus independent component analysis
    Meyer-Baese, A
    Wismueller, A
    Lange, O
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2004, 8 (03): : 387 - 398