Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

被引:109
|
作者
Liu, Hui [1 ]
Tao, Huiren [1 ]
Luo, Zhuojing [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Xian 710032, Peoples R China
关键词
low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; simplified Chinese version; reliability; validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2b34
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation were performed on the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Objective. The objective of this study was to translate and adapt the ODI into simplified Chinese and to then validate its use in Chinese patients with low back pain. Summary of Background Data. A traditional Chinese version of the ODI (TCODI) has been developed and used in Hong Kong. However, there is no simplified Chinese version of the ODI (SCODI). Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the latest version of the ODI (2.1a) were performed following instructions from the published international guidelines. The translation procedure included forward translation, back translation, and a discussion among experts. The prefinal version was tested in 40 outpatients with LBP. Then, 179 patients with LBP, including 140 outpatients and 39 inpatients, participated in the final test. They finished the SCODI, the Short-Form 36, and the Visual Analog Scale. Those 39 inpatients also finished a second ODI questionnaire within 24 hours. Last, the SCODI and TCODI were tested in another 25 inpatients for comparison. Results. All of the patients in the prefinal test understood the simplified Chinese version correctly. In the final test, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.93. A very high intraclass correlation coefficient was observed (ICC = 0.99) in the test-retest group. The SCODI showed a significant correlation with the 8 subscales of the Short-Form 36, especially in physical functioning (r = 0.78, P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between the ODI scores and the Visual Analog Scale (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). A significant difference in the mean score was demonstrated between the SCODI and the TCODI. Patients who participated in the comparison test all agreed that the SCODI was easier to understand than the TCODI. Conclusion. The results showed that the translation and adaptation were successful. The SCODI has proven to be valid and reliable when used in the simplified Chinese speaking population.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1216
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index Point of View
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (11) : 1217 - 1217
  • [2] Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Ivan Domazet
    Jakob Nemir
    Petra Barl
    Krešimir Saša Đurić
    Ivan Pašalić
    Hrvoje Barić
    Marin Stančić
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 2814 - 2822
  • [3] Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Kim, DY
    Lee, SH
    Lee, HY
    Lee, HJ
    Chang, SB
    Chung, SK
    Kim, HJ
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (05) : E123 - E127
  • [4] Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Domazet, Ivan
    Nemir, Jakob
    Barl, Petra
    Duric, Kresimir Sasa
    Pasalic, Ivan
    Baric, Hrvoje
    Stancic, Marin
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (11) : 2814 - 2822
  • [5] Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1
    Lue, Yi-Jing
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    Huang, Mao-Hsiung
    Lin, Gau-Tyan
    Lu, Yen-Mou
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (21) : 2354 - 2360
  • [6] Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Polish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Miekisiak, Grzegorz
    Kollataj, Marta
    Dobrogowski, Jan
    Kloc, Wojciech
    Libionka, Witold
    Banach, Mariusz
    Latka, Dariusz
    Sobolewski, Tomasz
    Sulewski, Adam
    Nowakowski, Andrzej
    Kiwic, Grzegorz
    Pala, Adam
    Potaczek, Tomasz
    Gierlotka, Maciej
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (04) : E237 - E243
  • [7] Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain
    Yakut, E
    Düger, T
    Öksüz, C
    Yörükan, S
    Üreten, K
    Turan, D
    Firat, T
    Kiraz, S
    Kirdi, N
    Kayihan, H
    Yakut, Y
    Güler, C
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (05) : 581 - 585
  • [8] The Oswestry Disability Index (Version 2.1a)
    van Hooff, Miranda L.
    Spruit, Maarten
    Fairbank, Jeremy C. T.
    van Limbeek, Jacques
    Jacobs, Wilco C. H.
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (02) : E83 - E90
  • [9] Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    Kim, Dong-Jae
    Kim, Se-Kang
    Kim, Dong-Jun
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    Park, Heui-Jeon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 21 (06) : 1092 - 1097
  • [10] Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain
    Ma, Chao
    Wu, Shaoling
    Xiao, Lingjun
    Xue, Yunlian
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (03) : 475 - 481