The Oswestry Disability Index (Version 2.1a)

被引:84
|
作者
van Hooff, Miranda L. [1 ]
Spruit, Maarten [2 ]
Fairbank, Jeremy C. T. [3 ]
van Limbeek, Jacques [4 ]
Jacobs, Wilco C. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Res, Box 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Orthoped, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[4] Achmea Hlth Insurance Co, Zeist, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; measure; outcome; validity; surgery; functional status; Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; patient-reported outcome measure; outcome assessment; condition-specific questionnaire; cross-cultural adaptation; quality; spine; care; CROSS-CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; LOW-BACK-PAIN; GERMAN VERSION; SELF-REPORT; PART; RELIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; ROLAND; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000683
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A cross-sectional study on baseline data. Objective. To translate the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a into the Dutch language and to validate its use in a cohort of patients with chronic low back pain in secondary spine care. Summary of Background Data. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly accepted to evaluate the outcome of spine interventions. Functional status is an important outcome in spine research. The ODI is a recommended condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate functional status in patients with back pain. As yet, no formal translated Dutch version exists. Methods. The ODI was translated according to established guidelines. The final version was built into the electronic web-based system in addition with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, the numeric rating scale for pain severity, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire for quality of life, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Baseline data were used of 244 patients with chronic low back pain who participated in a combined physical and psychological program. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and the construct validity were evaluated using quality criteria. Results. The mean ODI (standard deviation) was 39.6 (12.3); minimum 6, maximum 70. Most of the participants (88%) were moderately to severely disabled. Factor analysis determined a 1-factor structure (36% explained variance) and the homogeneity of ODI items is shown (Cronbach alpha = 0.79). The construct validity is supported as all (6: 6) the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. Moreover, the ODI and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, showed a strong significant correlation (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and an overlap: mean difference of - 18 (95% limits of agreement: - 44 to 8). Conclusion. The Dutch ODI version 2.1a is a valid and valuable tool for the measurement of functional status and disability among Dutch patients with chronic low back pain. This translated condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure version is recommended for use in future back pain research and to evaluate outcome of back care in the Netherlands.
引用
收藏
页码:E83 / E90
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a
    Shah, Sweni
    Balaganapathy, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (05) : 1103 - 1109
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) in Indian Population
    Joshi, Veena D.
    Raiturker, Pradyumna P. Pai
    Kulkarni, Aditi A.
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (11) : E662 - E668
  • [3] Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1
    Lue, Yi-Jing
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    Huang, Mao-Hsiung
    Lin, Gau-Tyan
    Lu, Yen-Mou
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (21) : 2354 - 2360
  • [4] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Adamu, Aisha S.
    Ibrahim, Aminu A.
    Ahmad, Rufa'i Y.
    Akindele, Mukadas O.
    Kaka, Bashir
    Mukhtar, Naziru B.
    [J]. SPINE, 2019, 44 (18) : E1092 - E1102
  • [5] Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Ivan Domazet
    Jakob Nemir
    Petra Barl
    Krešimir Saša Đurić
    Ivan Pašalić
    Hrvoje Barić
    Marin Stančić
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 2814 - 2822
  • [6] Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Kim, DY
    Lee, SH
    Lee, HY
    Lee, HJ
    Chang, SB
    Chung, SK
    Kim, HJ
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (05) : E123 - E127
  • [7] Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Domazet, Ivan
    Nemir, Jakob
    Barl, Petra
    Duric, Kresimir Sasa
    Pasalic, Ivan
    Baric, Hrvoje
    Stancic, Marin
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (11) : 2814 - 2822
  • [8] CONCEPT FINDER, VERSION 2.1A
    HAFNER, AW
    WHITELY, WP
    [J]. LIBRARY SOFTWARE REVIEW, 1989, 8 (01): : 36 - 39
  • [9] Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Liu, Hui
    Tao, Huiren
    Luo, Zhuojing
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (11) : 1211 - 1216
  • [10] Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Gamus, Dorit
    Glasser, Saralee
    Langner, Elisheva
    Beth-Hakimian, Aliza
    Caspi, Israel
    Carmel, Narin
    Siev-Ner, Itzhak
    Amir, Hagai
    Papa, Moshe
    Ziv, Amitai
    Lerner-Geva, Liat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (01) : 135 - 143