Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

被引:109
|
作者
Liu, Hui [1 ]
Tao, Huiren [1 ]
Luo, Zhuojing [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Xian 710032, Peoples R China
关键词
low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; simplified Chinese version; reliability; validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2b34
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation were performed on the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Objective. The objective of this study was to translate and adapt the ODI into simplified Chinese and to then validate its use in Chinese patients with low back pain. Summary of Background Data. A traditional Chinese version of the ODI (TCODI) has been developed and used in Hong Kong. However, there is no simplified Chinese version of the ODI (SCODI). Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the latest version of the ODI (2.1a) were performed following instructions from the published international guidelines. The translation procedure included forward translation, back translation, and a discussion among experts. The prefinal version was tested in 40 outpatients with LBP. Then, 179 patients with LBP, including 140 outpatients and 39 inpatients, participated in the final test. They finished the SCODI, the Short-Form 36, and the Visual Analog Scale. Those 39 inpatients also finished a second ODI questionnaire within 24 hours. Last, the SCODI and TCODI were tested in another 25 inpatients for comparison. Results. All of the patients in the prefinal test understood the simplified Chinese version correctly. In the final test, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.93. A very high intraclass correlation coefficient was observed (ICC = 0.99) in the test-retest group. The SCODI showed a significant correlation with the 8 subscales of the Short-Form 36, especially in physical functioning (r = 0.78, P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between the ODI scores and the Visual Analog Scale (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). A significant difference in the mean score was demonstrated between the SCODI and the TCODI. Patients who participated in the comparison test all agreed that the SCODI was easier to understand than the TCODI. Conclusion. The results showed that the translation and adaptation were successful. The SCODI has proven to be valid and reliable when used in the simplified Chinese speaking population.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1216
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric properties of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Mattie, Ryan
    McCormick, Zachary
    Barlund, Esa
    Laimi, Katri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (03) : 202 - 208
  • [42] RASCH ANALYSIS OF THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
    Lochhead, Lois
    MacMillan, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2010, 69 : 210 - 214
  • [43] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index
    Mbada, Chidozie Emmanuel
    Oguntoyinbo, Oluwabunmi Esther
    Fasuyi, Francis Oluwafunso
    Idowu, Opeyemi Ayodiipo
    Odole, Adesola Christiana
    Ayanniyi, Olusola
    Johnson, Olubusola Esther
    Orimolade, Elkanah Ayodele
    Oladiran, Ajibola Babatunde
    Fatoye, Francis
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [44] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Adamu, Aisha S.
    Ibrahim, Aminu A.
    Ahmad, Rufa'i Y.
    Akindele, Mukadas O.
    Kaka, Bashir
    Mukhtar, Naziru B.
    [J]. SPINE, 2019, 44 (18) : E1092 - E1102
  • [45] Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index
    Fairbank, Jeremy C. T.
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (25) : 2787 - 2789
  • [46] RASCH ANALYSIS OF THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
    Lochhead, L.
    Macmillan, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2010, 69 : 205 - 206
  • [47] The Oswestry Disability Index - Point of view
    Walsh, T
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2953 - 2953
  • [48] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Waddell Disability Index for patients with nonspecific low back pain in Mainland China
    Cheng, Xingdong
    Xue, Rong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (27) : E34344
  • [49] Validation of the simplified Chinese (Mainland) version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-CHNPLAGH)
    Chen, Hua
    Ji, Xinran
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Yiling
    Zhang, Lihai
    Tang, Peifu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [50] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale
    Cao, Shiqi
    Zhou, Chunhui
    Wang, Qi
    Hu, Fanqi
    Zhang, Leiming
    Ding, Yu
    Zhang, Xuesong
    [J]. SPINE, 2021, 46 (15) : 1048 - 1053