General instruments for risk assessment

被引:15
|
作者
Lewis, AHO [1 ]
Webster, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
risk assessment; violence prediction;
D O I
10.1097/01.yco.0000139978.68060.5a
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Purpose of review The identification of those who may be at increased risk of exhibiting violence is one of the highest-profile tasks of mental health professionals. Risk assessment is a rapidly developing field, and a number of instruments have been proposed for facilitating this task. Recent findings This article summarizes the main developments in the field of risk assessment and examines the key themes that have emerged over the past year. It discusses recent findings concerning comparisons between risk-assessment instruments and ways of optimizing the predictive accuracy of risk-assessment tools. A trend over the past year has been that risk assessment has begun to be seen as a multi-disciplinary task rather than falling within the remit of a single professional group. Several papers in the past year have explored issues concerned with the practical application of risk-assessment instruments. Summary Risk-assessment instruments can play a valuable role in identifying those who may be at increased risk of exhibiting violent behaviour. However, they should be interpreted with caution rather than being regarded as fixed entities. Practitioners should be aware that all risk-assessment instruments are 'works in progress' and are likely to require ongoing revision.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 405
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review
    S. Nayak
    D. L. Edwards
    A. A. Saleh
    S. L. Greenspan
    [J]. Osteoporosis International, 2014, 25 : 23 - 49
  • [32] Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review
    Nayak, S.
    Edwards, D. L.
    Saleh, A. A.
    Greenspan, S. L.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (01) : 23 - 49
  • [33] Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes
    Rettenberger, Martin
    Matthes, Anna
    Boer, Douglas P.
    Eher, Reinhard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 54 (02) : 169 - 186
  • [34] A Comparison of Four Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Instruments in Saudi Patients
    Hasabullah, Manar
    Kahtani, Fatamah
    Balkhoyor, Tasneem
    Al-Harbi, Lama
    Kinsara, Abdulhalim J.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [35] Performance of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments in US Correctional Settings
    Desmarais, Sarah L.
    Johnson, Kiersten L.
    Singh, Jay P.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2016, 13 (03) : 206 - 222
  • [36] Suicide Risk Screening and Assessment Designing Instruments with Dissemination in Mind
    Boudreaux, Edwin D.
    Horowitz, Lisa M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (03) : S163 - S169
  • [37] Structured Risk Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Implementation Determinants
    Levin, Sara K.
    Nilsen, Per
    Bendtsen, Preben
    Bulow, Per
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2016, 23 (04) : 602 - 628
  • [38] Limits of actuarial risk assessment instruments for the search of truth in predictivity
    Thierry Hoang Pham
    Ducro, Claire
    Marghem, Benoit
    Reveillere, Christian
    Benezech, Michel
    [J]. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2012, 170 (02): : 103 - 105
  • [39] Flood risk assessment instruments for municipal governance in southern Murcia
    Perez Morales, Alfredo
    [J]. INVESTIGACIONES GEOGRAFICAS-SPAIN, 2009, (48): : 97 - 123
  • [40] An Integrated Risk Assessment for Analytical Instruments and Computerized Laboratory Systems
    Burgess, C.
    McDowall, R. D.
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY, 2013, 28 (11) : 20 - 27