Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions

被引:0
|
作者
Rath, Manasa [1 ]
Wang, Peiling [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Commun & Informat, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Knoxville, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Open Science; Open Peer Review; OPR; Scientific publishing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The quality of Open Access journals is an important issue in developing digital library collections. Traditional criteria, such as peer review, may not be able to identify the quality of peer-reviewed publications. Open peer review (OPR) has emerged as an innovation of open science. OPR is still at an early development stage with various models, from revealing identities of the author and the reviewer to publishing the entire peer review history of the accepted paper. This pilot study utilizes qualitative interviews to investigate researchers' perceptions and attitudes towards the emerging publishing model. Through semi-structured interviews with seven researchers, this pilot study reports on the thoughts and opinions of the interviewees towards OPR and proposes further studies on the potential of OPR in scientific publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 318
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overview of Brazilian Information Science research on open peer review
    Maia, Francisca Clotilde de Andrade
    Nunes, Jefferson Veras
    Farias, Maria Giovanna Guedes
    [J]. ATOZ-NOVAS PRATICAS EM INFORMACAO E CONHECIMENTO, 2023, 12 : 11 - 13
  • [22] Fairness and Bias in Peer Review: Anonymity, Open Science, and Preprints
    Houser, Kevin W.
    [J]. LEUKOS, 2022, 18 (04) : 415 - 416
  • [23] o'Peer: open peer review
    Brewer, J. H.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MUON SPIN ROTATION, RELAXATION AND RESONANCE, 2014, 551
  • [24] Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers
    Mullen, Laura Bowering
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (1_SUPPL):
  • [25] An experiment in open peer review
    Matthew
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (18) : 1401 - 1401
  • [26] Adoption of Open Peer Review
    Peci, Alketa
    [J]. REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2022, 56 (04):
  • [27] Keywords for Open Peer Review
    Fitzpatrick, Kathleen
    Rowe, Katherine
    [J]. LOGOS-JOURNAL OF THE WORLD PUBLISHING COMMUNITY, 2010, 21 (3-4): : 133 - 141
  • [28] The case for open peer review
    Morrison, Jill
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (09) : 830 - 831
  • [29] Challenges to open peer review
    Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2019, 43 (02) : 197 - 200
  • [30] Peer review: Open, not anonymous
    Berezin, AA
    [J]. SCIENTIST, 2001, 15 (15): : 6 - 6