Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Production from Different Wood Pellet Supply Chains

被引:33
|
作者
Sgarbossa, Andrea [1 ]
Boschiero, Martina [1 ]
Pierobon, Francesca [2 ]
Cavalli, Raffaele [1 ]
Zanetti, Michela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Land Environm Agr & Forestry, Viale Univ 16, I-35020 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
FORESTS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
biomass sources; wood pellets; bioenergy; forest wood feedstock; life cycle assessment; emissions; environmental impacts; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; KEY ISSUES; BIOMASS; RESIDUES; ENERGY; SYSTEMS; HEAT; ELECTRICITY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.3390/f11111127
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The EU is one of the largest producers and consumers of wood pellets in the world, covering around 36% of the global wood pellet production and around 50% of the global consumption in 2018. The EU wood pellet consumption is expected to further increase in response to the ambitious energy and climate goals for 2030. Currently, wood pellets are mainly produced from sawdust and other sawmill residues; however, other types of forest feedstock are being investigated in order to meet the increasing wood pellet demand and move toward greater energy independence. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the environmental impact of different wood pellet supply chains. A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment is performed considering the following wood feedstock systems: (i) sawdust from sawmill (S1), (ii) roundwood logs (S2), (iii) whole trees from forest thinning operation (S3), and (iv) logging residues produced during forest tree harvesting (S4). The study focuses on Global Warming Potential (GWP), Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP), Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), and Human Toxicity Potential (HTP). Results show that S3 displays the lowest figures on all the environmental impact categories considered in this study. Compared to the reference case S1, S3 shows a GWP reduction of 46%, an ODP reduction of 6.6%, a POCP reduction of 14.8%, and HTP reduction of 13.2%. S3 and S4 have lower GWP than S1 and S2, even when the biogenic CO2 emissions are considered. Overall, the life cycle phases that have the highest GWP, POCP, and HTP are the burning phase and the preparation of the material to be pelletized, particularly the drying process. Nevertheless, the main phases that contribute to the ODP are the forest operations and the pellet preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice—a life cycle assessment
    Anne Roedl
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15 : 567 - 578
  • [42] Assessment of bioenergy production from mid-rotation thinning of hardwood plantation: life cycle assessment and cost analysis
    Lu, Hangyong Ray
    El Hanandeh, Ali
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (08) : 2021 - 2040
  • [43] Comparative life cycle assessment of different propulsion systems
    Fleissner, T
    [J]. LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING OF PASSENGER CARS: RESOURCES - PRODUCTION - USAGE - RECYCLING, 1996, 1307 : 137 - 155
  • [44] Assessment of bioenergy production from mid-rotation thinning of hardwood plantation: life cycle assessment and cost analysis
    Hangyong Ray Lu
    Ali El Hanandeh
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2017, 19 : 2021 - 2040
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment of organic and conventional apple supply chains in the North of Italy
    Longo, Sonia
    Mistretta, Marina
    Guarino, Francesco
    Cellura, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 654 - 663
  • [46] A life cycle sustainability assessment of organic and conventional pork supply chains in Sweden
    Zira, Stanley
    Rydhmer, Lotta
    Ivarsson, Emma
    Hoffmann, Ruben
    Roos, Elin
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 21 - 38
  • [47] Comparative life cycle assessment of ethanol production from fast-growing wood crops (black locust, eucalyptus and poplar)
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Teresa Moreira, M.
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Murphy, Richard J.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 39 : 378 - 388
  • [48] A Comparative Study on Life Cycle Assessment of Typical Wood base Furniture
    Wang, Shuyi
    Su, Daizhong
    Zhu, Shifan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (ICSEEE 2016), 2016, 63 : 634 - 640
  • [49] Wood and timber derived products in comparative life cycle assessment studies
    Richter, K
    Gugerli, H
    [J]. HOLZ ALS ROH-UND WERKSTOFF, 1996, 54 (04): : 225 - 231
  • [50] Comparison of algae cultivation methods for bioenergy production using a combined life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach
    Resurreccion, Eleazer P.
    Colosi, Lisa M.
    White, Mark A.
    Clarens, Andres F.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 126 : 298 - 306