Assessment of bioenergy production from mid-rotation thinning of hardwood plantation: life cycle assessment and cost analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Lu, Hangyong Ray [1 ]
El Hanandeh, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Sch Engn, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Hardwood thinning; Bioenergy; Biomass; GASIFICATION COMBINED HEAT; WOODY BIOMASS; FAST PYROLYSIS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; POWER-GENERATION; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; KEY ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-017-1386-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forestry thinning logs, a low-value by-product of the forestry industry, present an opportunity for bioenergy production. It can be converted into solid, liquid, and gaseous fuels via different conversion techniques. Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing (LCC) analysis were conducted to evaluate six options: woodchip gasification for power generation; wood pellets gasification in combined heat and power plant; wood pellet combustion for domestic water and space heating; pyrolysis for power generation; pyrolysis with bio-oil upgrading to transportation fuels; and ethanol production for transportation fuel mix. The functional unit used in this study was the treatment of 1 Mg of biomass. Global warming; acidification; eutrophication; fossil depletion, human toxicity; and land use impact categories were considered. The LCC also included greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions costs. The effects of uncertainties in the system on the overall performance of the scenarios were also evaluated. The results showed that all options except for ethanol production are GHG emission negative. Woodchips gasification performed best in all environmental impact categories and had the lowest LCC ($177.6/Mg). Biomass drying consumed more than 50% of the energy requirement for all options except for production of liquid transportation fuels via upgrading of pyrolytic oil, in which case the fuel upgrading process was the most energy intensive. In terms of energy return, all options, except electricity production through pyrolysis, offered positive return. The results highlight the importance of using biomass with least possible processing in order to maximise environmental and energy return and minimise LCC.
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2040
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of bioenergy production from mid-rotation thinning of hardwood plantation: life cycle assessment and cost analysis
    Hangyong Ray Lu
    Ali El Hanandeh
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2017, 19 : 2021 - 2040
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of ACQ-treated Veneer Based Composite (VBC) hollow utility poles from hardwood plantation mid-thinning
    Lu, Hangyong
    El Hanandeh, Ali
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2016, 5 : 36 - 50
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from wood sawdust
    Alizadeh, Peyman
    Mupondwa, Edmund
    Tabil, Lope G.
    Li, Xue
    Cree, Duncan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 427
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of eucalyptus short rotation coppices for bioenergy production in southern France
    Gabrielle, Benoit
    Nicolas Nguyen The
    Maupu, Pauline
    Vial, Estelle
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2013, 5 (01): : 30 - 42
  • [5] Reliability of laminated veneer lumber (LVL) beams manufactured from early to mid-rotation subtropical hardwood plantation logs
    Gilbert, Benoit P.
    Zhang, Hao
    Bailleres, Henri
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2019, 78 : 88 - 99
  • [6] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of Jatropha biodiesel production in China
    Liu, Yanbing
    Zhu, Zongyuan
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhao, Xubo
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022,
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Magnesia Spinel Brick Production
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Tok, Gulden
    Karacasulu, Levent
    Metesoy, Melike
    Banar, Mufide
    Kara, Alpagut
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07):
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of coconut plantation, copra, and charcoal production
    Puspaningrum, T.
    Indrasti, N. S.
    Indrawanto, C.
    Yani, M.
    [J]. GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2023, 9 (04): : 653 - 672
  • [9] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Bingbing Fang
    Yubing Zhang
    Yunfei Liu
    Jiacheng Yu
    Mohamed Farghali
    Ahmed K. Rashwan
    Zhonghao Chen
    Lin Chen
    Ikko Ihara
    David W. Rooney
    Pow-Seng Yap
    [J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2024, 22 : 1115 - 1154
  • [10] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of surgical mask from production to recycling into hydrogen process
    Yin, Kexin
    Wei, Ranran
    Ruan, Jiuxu
    Cui, Peizhe
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Zhao, Xinling
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 283