Short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with migraine

被引:21
|
作者
Yenice, Ozlem [1 ]
Temel, Ahmet
Incili, Burcin
Tuncer, Nese
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
SWAP; migraine; glaucoma;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-005-0083-7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The aim was to investigate short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine. Fifteen migraine and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers with normal ophthalmologic examination participated in this study. Migraine characteristics were graded by the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS). All participants underwent SWAP (short wavelength amplitude perimetry) testing using a Humphrey field analyzer; there was a 30-2 presentation pattern. Short wavelength amplitude perimetry parameters for mean deviation (MD; p < 0.0001) and pattern standard deviation (PSD; p < 0.0001) were significantly worse in the migraine group. In the migraine group 53.3%. of eyes had glaucoma hemi-field tests (GHT) outside normal limits and 10 of these had early glaucomatous visual field loss. Statistically significant correlations were found between frequency of migraine attacks and MD (p=0.02; r=0.56) and PSD (p=0.03; r=0.41) and also between the MIDAS score and MD (p=0.03; r=0.49) and PSD (p=0.04; r=0.51). In all migraine cases with early glaucomatous visual field defect a corresponding site of the head was predominantly involved in headache (p=0.03). Some patients with severe migraine have earlier defects on SWAP suggesting a common vascular insult of glaucoma and migraine, and all migraine cases with high MIDAS scores should be further evaluated for early glaucomatous visual field defects using SWAP.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 595
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extension and depth of perimetric defects: Comparison of short-wavelength automated perimetry vs conventional perimetry
    Polo, V
    Larrosa, JM
    Pablo, LE
    Fernandez, FJ
    Honrubia, FM
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 33 (03) : 221 - 224
  • [42] Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients
    Hutchings, N
    Hosking, SL
    Wild, JM
    Flanagan, JG
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (10) : 2332 - 2337
  • [43] Short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine
    McKendrick, AM
    Cioffi, GA
    Johnson, CA
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (02) : 154 - 161
  • [44] A Comparison of Learning Effects for Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-wavelength Automated Perimetry and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Healthy Subjects
    Myers, Lorraine
    Hu, Rongrong
    Morgan, Linda S.
    Hoop, Joni S.
    Racette, Lyne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [45] Pointwise analysis of short-wavelength automated perimetry thresholds in a normal population.
    Wild, JM
    Cubbidge, RP
    Pacey, E
    Robinson, R
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 4998 - 4998
  • [46] Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucoma suspects
    Polo, V
    Larrosa, JM
    Pinilla, I
    Gonzalvo, F
    Ferreras, A
    Honrubia, FM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [47] Short wavelength automated perimetry
    Wild, JM
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 79 (06): : 546 - 559
  • [48] SHORT-WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY IN EARLY AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
    SOM, A
    GEHRS, KM
    RUSSELL, SR
    BASSI, CJ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S233 - S233
  • [49] Short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic retinopathy:: Correlation to macular vascular morphology
    Hendricks, S
    Remky, A
    Rüffer, M
    Arend, O
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S308 - S308
  • [50] Effect of Yellow-Tinted Intraocular Lenses on Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry
    Mainster, Martin A.
    Turner, Patricia L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 150 (04) : 589 - 590