Voxel dosimetry: Comparison of MCNPX and DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo codes in patient specific phantom calculations

被引:3
|
作者
Hadad, Kamal [1 ]
Saeedi-Moghadam, Mahdi [2 ]
Zeinali-Rafsanjani, Banafsheh [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Nucl Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Med Imaging Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Nucl Med & Mol Imaging Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
MCNPX; EGSnrc; voxel phantom; patient specific phantom; DOSXYZnrc; DVH; HYBRID COMPUTATIONAL PHANTOMS; CANCER-RISK ESTIMATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE CALCULATION; HUMAN ANATOMY; VALIDATION; EGS4; ELECTRON; MODELS; TOOL;
D O I
10.3233/THC-161240
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Dose evaluation with two Monte Carlo codes using patient specific voxel phantom is presented in this paper. We employ both MCNPX and DOSXYZnrc to perform dosimetry for mathematical voxel phantoms generated by our in-house developed voxel phantom generator and EGSnrc/CTCreate respectively. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Our case study was a 2.5 x 2.4 x 2.4 cm(3) tumor in the middle lobe of right lung of a male patient exposed to 6MV parallel beam. In order to compare these Monte Carlo codes with together gross tumor volume (GTV) and organ at risks (OAR) doses and dose volume histograms (DVH) were calculated. RESULTS: Comparing the mean absorbed dose results (in Gy) from both codes indicates that gross tumor volume, heart and spinal cord have 2% to 10% difference. The 10% difference between the codes were from the spinal cord region where was not in the therapy beam and it just received the scatter radiation. The dose volume DVH obtained from DOSXYZnrc results demonstrate a milder slope compared with MCNPX DVHs. CONCLUSION: It was revealed that MCNPX has some advantages in comparison to DOSXYZnrc, but it is important to consider that for equal precision in voxel dosimetry calculation, DOSXYZnrc runs faster than MCNPX and it is a great advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treating voxel geometries in radiation protection dosimetry with a patched version of the Monte Carlo codes MCNP and MCNPX
    Burn, K. W.
    Daffara, C.
    Gualdrini, G.
    Pierantoni, M.
    Ferrari, P.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 123 (03) : 345 - 353
  • [2] All about MAX: a male adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculations in radiation protection dosimetry
    Kramer, R
    Vieira, JW
    Khoury, HJ
    Lima, FRA
    Fuelle, D
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (10): : 1239 - 1262
  • [3] Monte Carlo tumor dosimetry calculations for BNCT voxel model
    Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao, 2007, SUPPL. 1 (910-913):
  • [4] A flexible Monte Carlo tool for patient or phantom specific calculations: comparison with preliminary validation measurements
    Davidson, S.
    Cui, J.
    Followill, D.
    Ibbott, G.
    Deasy, J.
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUES IN RADIOTHERAPY DELIVERY AND VERIFICATION - THIRD MCGILL INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP, 2008, 102
  • [5] Canine Anatomic Voxel Phantom for Internal Dosimetry: Comparison between Monte-Carlo and Convolution Method
    Moreau, M.
    Govignon, A.
    Mauxion, T.
    Fusellier, M.
    Abadie, J.
    Bardies, M.
    Hindorf, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 : S318 - S318
  • [6] Comparison of MCNPX and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes in the simulating a nuclear gauge
    Mohtaram, Saeid
    Tajik, Mojtaba
    Peyvandi, Reza Gholipour
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2021, 170
  • [7] Comparison of MCNPX and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes in the simulating a nuclear gauge
    Mohtaram S.
    Tajik M.
    Peyvandi R.G.
    Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2021, 170
  • [8] Absorbed Dose in Molecular Radiotherapy: a Comparison Study of Monte Carlo, Dose Voxel Kernels and Phantom Based Dosimetry
    Marcatili, S.
    Mauxion, T.
    Villoing, D.
    McParland, B. J.
    Bardies, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S174 - S174
  • [9] Comparison of patient absorbed doses calculated using three methods: OLINDA/EXM, voxel S values and Monte Carlo simulation with DOSXYZnrc
    Grimes, J.
    Celler, A.
    Shcherbinin, S.
    Piwowarska-Bilska, H.
    Birkenfeld, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 : S322 - S322
  • [10] Comparison of Various Monte Carlo Codes for Brachytherapy Source Dosimetry
    Meigooni, A.
    Luerman, C.
    Perez-Calatayud, J.
    Ballester, F.
    Rivard, M.
    Sowards, K.
    Zehtabian, M.
    Walmsley, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)