A 10-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study of Implants Placed after Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with an 80:20 Mixture of Deproteinized Bovine Bone and Autogenous Bone

被引:42
|
作者
Mordenfeld, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albrektsson, Tomas [3 ,4 ]
Hallman, Mats [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Publ Hlth Serv, Gavle, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res & Dev, Gavleborg Cty Council, Gavleborg, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Technol, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Biomat, Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
clinical study; dental implants; deproteinized bovine bone; sinus floor augmentation; SURFACE DENTAL IMPLANTS; BIO-OSS; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL RATES; GRAFT HEIGHT; FIBRIN GLUE; ELEVATION; COMBINATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; SUBSTITUTE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background There is a need for prospective, long-term follow-up studies of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Purpose The aim of the present study was to determine whether deprotenized bovine bone (DPBB) used for MSFA may result in long-term stability of placed dental implants. Material and Methods Fourteen of the 20 patients included in the study were followed throughout the 10 years study period. These patients had 53 implants placed in 22 (6 unilateral and 8 bilateral) maxillary sinuses augmented with a mixture of 80% DPBB and 20% autogenous bone (80:20), and 15 implants placed in non-grafted sites. Clinical and radiographic examinations of the implants and grafts were performed. Results After 10 years of functional loading 15 of the initially placed 108 implants had been lost giving a cumulative survival rate of 86%. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.6 +/- 1.0mm. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone level, pocket depth, or ISQ-values between implants placed in residual or grafted bone or between smokers or non-smokers at 10 years follow-up. There was a statistically significant reduction (p<.01) in graft height between 3 months and 2 years but no further significant reduction up to 10 years. Conclusions The first 2 years after placement of implants with turned surfaces placed in sites after sinus floor augmentation with DPBB and autogenous bone seem to be critical for implant survival. At 10 years follow-up, the remaining implants presented excellent clinical and radiological results regardless of smoking habits or implant sites (augmented or residual bone).
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 446
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Five-year outcome of bone remodelling around implants in the maxillary sinus: assessment of differences between implants placed in autogenous inlay bone blocks and in ungrafted maxilla
    Martuscelli, R.
    Toti, P.
    Sbordone, L.
    Guidetti, F.
    Ramaglia, L.
    Sbordone, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (09) : 1117 - 1126
  • [42] Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
    Crespi Roberto
    Toti Paolo
    Crespi Giovanni
    Covani Ugo
    Brevi Bruno
    Menchini-Fabris Giovanni-Battista
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [43] Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
    Roberto, Crespi
    Paolo, Toti
    Giovanni, Crespi
    Ugo, Covani
    Bruno, Brevi
    Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [44] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Two Different Inorganic Bovine Bone Grafts: an Experimental Study in Rabbits
    Ferreira Balan, Vitor
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Masuda, Katsuhiko
    Pires Godoy, Eduardo
    Xavier, Samuel Porfirio
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (02): : 93 - 105
  • [45] Influence of maxillary antrolith on the clinical outcome of implants placed simultaneously with osteotome sinus floor elevation: A retrospective radiographic study
    Chen, Hsuan-Hung
    Yi, Chieh-An
    Chen, Ya-Chi
    Tsai, Chia-Chin
    Lin, Po-Yen
    Huang, Her-Hsiung
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (06) : 833 - 841
  • [46] Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs
    Jensen, Thomas
    Schou, Soren
    Gundersen, Hans Jorgen G.
    Forman, Julie Lyng
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    Holmstrup, Palle
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (06) : 635 - 644
  • [47] Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite
    Boëck-Neto, R
    Gabrielli, MFR
    Lia, RCC
    Marcantonio, E
    Shibli, JA
    Marcantonio, E
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 73 (03) : 266 - 270
  • [48] Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study
    Ha, Jinhee
    Son, Jang-Ho
    Sung, Iel-Yong
    Cho, Yeong-Cheol
    Choi, Jong-Ho
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (03) : 270 - 277
  • [49] Supercritical CO2 Viral-Inactivated Allogenic Bone Graft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures: 10-Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Results
    Chalard, Jean-Jacques
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 41 (03) : 433 - +
  • [50] Optimal microvessel density from composite graft of autogenous maxillary cortical bone and anorganic bovine bone in sinus augmentation: influence of clinical variables
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    Emilio Fernandez-Barbero, Juan
    Mesa, Francisco
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Dolores
    O'Valle, Francisco
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 221 - 227