A 10-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study of Implants Placed after Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with an 80:20 Mixture of Deproteinized Bovine Bone and Autogenous Bone

被引:42
|
作者
Mordenfeld, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albrektsson, Tomas [3 ,4 ]
Hallman, Mats [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Publ Hlth Serv, Gavle, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res & Dev, Gavleborg Cty Council, Gavleborg, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Technol, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Biomat, Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
clinical study; dental implants; deproteinized bovine bone; sinus floor augmentation; SURFACE DENTAL IMPLANTS; BIO-OSS; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL RATES; GRAFT HEIGHT; FIBRIN GLUE; ELEVATION; COMBINATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; SUBSTITUTE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background There is a need for prospective, long-term follow-up studies of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Purpose The aim of the present study was to determine whether deprotenized bovine bone (DPBB) used for MSFA may result in long-term stability of placed dental implants. Material and Methods Fourteen of the 20 patients included in the study were followed throughout the 10 years study period. These patients had 53 implants placed in 22 (6 unilateral and 8 bilateral) maxillary sinuses augmented with a mixture of 80% DPBB and 20% autogenous bone (80:20), and 15 implants placed in non-grafted sites. Clinical and radiographic examinations of the implants and grafts were performed. Results After 10 years of functional loading 15 of the initially placed 108 implants had been lost giving a cumulative survival rate of 86%. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.6 +/- 1.0mm. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone level, pocket depth, or ISQ-values between implants placed in residual or grafted bone or between smokers or non-smokers at 10 years follow-up. There was a statistically significant reduction (p<.01) in graft height between 3 months and 2 years but no further significant reduction up to 10 years. Conclusions The first 2 years after placement of implants with turned surfaces placed in sites after sinus floor augmentation with DPBB and autogenous bone seem to be critical for implant survival. At 10 years follow-up, the remaining implants presented excellent clinical and radiological results regardless of smoking habits or implant sites (augmented or residual bone).
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 446
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of the use of autogenous bone particles to close the access window after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: an experimental study in rabbits
    Giacomo Favero
    Jose Viña-Almunia
    Carmen Carda
    José Javier Martín de Llano
    Berta García-Mira
    David Soto-Peñaloza
    Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
    Daniele Botticelli
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [32] Influence of the use of autogenous bone particles to close the access window after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: an experimental study in rabbits
    Favero, Giacomo
    Vina-Almunia, Jose
    Carda, Carmen
    de Llano, Jose Javier
    Garcia-Mira, Berta
    Soto-Penaloza, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    Botticelli, Daniele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [33] Influence of Healing Period Upon Bone Turn Over on Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Grafted Solely with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: A Prospective Human Histological and Clinical Trial
    Wang, Feng
    Zhou, Wenjie
    Monje, Alberto
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Yueping
    Wu, Yiqun
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [34] Clinical evaluation of association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bovine bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous bone graft in sinus floor augmentation
    Moreira Serra e Silva, Fabricio
    de Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    Mazzonetto, Renato
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (06) : 931 - 935
  • [35] Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning
    Sbordone, Ludovico
    Levin, Liran
    Guidetti, Franco
    Sbordone, Carolina
    Glikman, Ari
    Schwartz-Arad, Devorah
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (05) : 485 - 491
  • [36] Clinical, radiographic, and histological/histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus grafting with deproteinized porcine or bovine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial
    Krennmair, Stefan
    Postl, Lukas
    Schwarze, Uwe Yacine
    Malek, Michael
    Stimmelmayr, Michal
    Krennmair, Gerald
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (11) : 1230 - 1247
  • [37] Impact of autogenous concentrated bone marrow aspirate on bone regeneration after sinus floor augmentation with a bovine bone substitute - a split-mouth pilot study
    Wildburger, Angelika
    Payer, Michael
    Jakse, Norbert
    Strunk, Dirk
    Etchard-Liechtenstein, Nathalie
    Sauerbier, Sebastian
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (10) : 1175 - 1181
  • [38] Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study
    Lutz, Rainer
    Berger-Fink, Susanne
    Stockmann, Philipp
    Neukam, Friedrich Wilhelm
    Schlegel, Karl Andreas
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 644 - 648
  • [40] Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review
    Graziani, F
    Donos, N
    Needleman, I
    Gabriele, M
    Tonetti, M
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (06) : 677 - 682