Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer

被引:24
|
作者
Muehldorfer-Fodor, Marion [1 ]
Ziegler, Steffen [1 ]
Harms, Christoph [2 ]
Neumann, Julia [2 ]
Cristalli, Alessandra [3 ]
Kalpen, Axel [3 ]
Kundt, Guenther [4 ]
Mittlmeier, Thomas [2 ]
Prommersberger, K. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhon Klinikum AG, Clin Hand Surg, D-97616 Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Dept Trauma & Reconstruct Surg, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
[3] Novel Biomech Lab, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Rostock, Inst Biostat & Informat Med & Ageing Res, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
Dynamic force measurement; Grip force; Grip strength; Jamar dynamometer; Manugraphy system; Sensor matrix; Pressure sensor mat; PINCH STRENGTH; FINGER FORCES; SIZE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; OBJECT;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
For clinical grip force assessment, the Jamar dynamometer is a wide accepted tool. Users have to be aware that this method does not represent all grip efforts applied. The Manugraphy system is a tool that measure total grip force as well as identify load distribution patterns of the hand while gripping cylinders wrapped with calibrated capacitive matrix sensor mats. The aim of this study was to validate an assessment setting of the Manugraphy system for clinical use. Further, the relationship and difference between the Manugraphy system and the Jamar dynamometer were investigated. At two study centers, 152 healthy volunteers performed grip force tests with a digital Jamar dynamometer using handle positions 3 and 4 and the novel(A (R)) Manugraphy system using two cylinders with circumferences of 150 and 200 mm. The subjects performed grip force testing with both devices on three different days. The intra- and inter-day variability for both methods was evaluated. To compare the values of both systems, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated. The force values, as measured by the sensor matrix, were higher than those of the Jamar dynamometer. Analyses showed significant positive correlations between values obtained by the two measurement methods (p < 0.001). There was no significant inter-day variation for the 200-mm cylinder of the Manugraphy system. For the 150-mm cylinder, a significant variation was observed at center B, but not at A. Nevertheless, the fluctuation of the grip force values obtained with the Manugraphy system was equal or better than those obtained with the Jamar dynamometer. The force values, obtained using the two systems, have a high correlation but are not directly comparable. Both systems allow valid and constant grip force measurement. As the sensor mat detects all forces applied perpendicularly to the cylinder surface, it characterizes grip force better than the Jamar dynamometer. In addition, information about load distribution of the hand is gained.
引用
收藏
页码:1179 / 1188
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer
    Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor
    Steffen Ziegler
    Christoph Harms
    Julia Neumann
    Alessandra Cristalli
    Axel Kalpen
    Günther Kundt
    Thomas Mittlmeier
    K. J. Prommersberger
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2014, 134 : 1179 - 1188
  • [2] Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study
    Stamate, Andreea
    Bertolaccini, Jonathan
    Deriaz, Michel
    Gunjan, Saket
    Marzan, Mircea-Dan
    Spiru, Luiza
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2023, 77 (05):
  • [3] Comparison of the BTE tech EVJ handgrip to the Jamar hand dynamometer for measuring grip strength
    Myers, Edwin J.
    Dominguez, David S.
    Guigliano, Melissa E.
    Mallory, Melissa G.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND DISABILITY, 2021, 33 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [4] Parameters influencing hand grip strength measured with the manugraphy system
    Alice Wichelhaus
    Christoph Harms
    Julia Neumann
    Steffen Ziegler
    Günther Kundt
    Karl Josef Prommersberger
    Thomas Mittlmeier
    Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [5] MEASUREMENT OF GRIP STRENGTH - VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SPHYGMOMANOMETER AND JAMAR GRIP DYNAMOMETER
    HAMILTON, GF
    MCDONALD, C
    CHENIER, TC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1992, 16 (05): : 215 - 219
  • [6] REVISED NORMATIVE VALUES FOR GRIP STRENGTH WITH THE JAMAR DYNAMOMETER
    Peters, M. J. H.
    van Nes, S., I
    Vanhoutte, E. K.
    Bakkers, M.
    van Doorn, P. A.
    Merkies, I. S. J.
    Faber, C. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2011, 16 : S107 - S108
  • [7] Revised normative values for grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer
    Peters, Martine J. H.
    van Nes, Sonja I.
    Vanhoutte, Els K.
    Bakkers, Mayienne
    van Doorn, Pieter A.
    Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
    Faber, Catharina G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2011, 16 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [8] Parameters influencing hand grip strength measured with the manugraphy system
    Wichelhaus, Alice
    Harms, Christoph
    Neumann, Julia
    Ziegler, Steffen
    Kundt, Guenther
    Prommersberger, Karl Josef
    Mittlmeier, Thomas
    Muehldorfer-Fodor, Marion
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [9] RELIABILITY OF GRIP STRENGTH ASSESSMENT WITH THE COMPUTERIZED JAMAR DYNAMOMETER
    NIEBUHR, BR
    MARION, R
    FIKE, ML
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1994, 14 (01): : 3 - 18
  • [10] Sensitivity of the Jamar dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort
    Ashford, RF
    Nagelburg, S
    Adkins, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (03): : 402 - 405