Structural basis for inhibition of an archaeal CRISPR-Cas type I-D large subunit by an anti-CRISPR protein

被引:17
|
作者
Manav, M. Cemre [1 ,3 ]
Van, Lan B. [1 ]
Lin, Jinzhong [2 ]
Fuglsang, Anders [2 ]
Peng, Xu [2 ]
Brodersen, Ditlev E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Gustav Wieds Vej 10c, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biol, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[3] MRC Lab Mol Biol, Cambridge CB2 0QH, England
关键词
CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIFICATION; CRYO-EM; NUCLEASE; BACTERIA; INTERFERENCE; MECHANISM; INSIGHTS; REVEALS; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-020-19847-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A hallmark of type I CRISPR-Cas systems is the presence of Cas3, which contains both the nuclease and helicase activities required for DNA cleavage during interference. In subtype I-D systems, however, the histidine-aspartate (HD) nuclease domain is encoded as part of a Cas10-like large effector complex subunit and the helicase activity in a separate Cas3' subunit, but the functional and mechanistic consequences of this organisation are not currently understood. Here we show that the Sulfolobus islandicus type I-D Cas10d large subunit exhibits an unusual domain architecture consisting of a Cas3-like HD nuclease domain fused to a degenerate polymerase fold and a C-terminal domain structurally similar to Cas11. Crystal structures of Cas10d both in isolation and bound to S. islandicus rod-shaped virus 3 AcrID1 reveal that the anti-CRISPR protein sequesters the large subunit in a non-functional state unable to form a cleavage-competent effector complex. The architecture of Cas10d suggests that the type I-D effector complex is similar to those found in type III CRISPR-Cas systems and that this feature is specifically exploited by phages for anti-CRISPR defence. In type I-D CRISPR-Cas systems, the nuclease and helicase activities are carried out by separate subunits. The crystal structure of Sulfolobus islandicus type I-D large subunit Cas10d, containing a nuclease domain, reveals unusual architecture. The structure of Cas10d in complex with anti-CRISPR protein AcrID1 suggests that the latter sequesters Cas10d in a nonfunctional state.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanistic insights into the inhibition of the CRISPR-Cas surveillance complex by anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF13
    Wang, Hao
    Gao, Teng
    Zhou, Yu
    Ren, Junhui
    Guo, Junhua
    Zeng, Jianwei
    Xiao, Yu
    Zhang, Yi
    Feng, Yue
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 298 (03)
  • [22] A Type I-F Anti-CRISPR Protein Inhibits the CRISPR-Cas Surveillance Complex by ADP-Ribosylation
    Niu, Yiying
    Yang, Lingguang
    Gao, Teng
    Dong, Changpeng
    Zhang, Buyu
    Yin, Peipei
    Hopp, Ann-Katrin
    Li, Dongdong
    Gan, Rui
    Wang, Hongou
    Liu, Xi
    Cao, Xueli
    Xie, Yongchao
    Meng, Xianbin
    Deng, Haiteng
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Ren, Jie
    Hottiger, Michael O.
    Chen, Zeliang
    Zhang, Yi
    Liu, Xiaoyun
    Feng, Yue
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2020, 80 (03) : 512 - +
  • [23] Anti-CRISPR Phages Cooperate to Overcome CRISPR-Cas Immunity
    Landsberger, Mariann
    Gandon, Sylvain
    Meaden, Sean
    Rollie, Clare
    Chevallereau, Anne
    Chabas, Helene
    Buckling, Angus
    Westra, Edze R.
    van Houte, Stineke
    CELL, 2018, 174 (04) : 908 - +
  • [24] Anti-CRISPR proteins encoded by archaeal lytic viruses inhibit subtype I-D immunity
    Fei He
    Yuvaraj Bhoobalan-Chitty
    Lan B. Van
    Anders L. Kjeldsen
    Matteo Dedola
    Kira S. Makarova
    Eugene V. Koonin
    Ditlev E. Brodersen
    Xu Peng
    Nature Microbiology, 2018, 3 : 461 - 469
  • [25] Anti-CRISPR proteins encoded by archaeal lytic viruses inhibit subtype I-D immunity
    He, Fei
    Bhoobalan-Chitty, Yuvaraj
    Van, Lan B.
    Kjeldsen, Anders L.
    Dedola, Matteo
    Makarova, Kira S.
    Koonin, Eugene V.
    Brodersen, Ditlev E.
    Peng, Xu
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 3 (04): : 461 - 469
  • [26] The biology and type I/III hybrid nature of type I-D CRISPR-Cas systems
    McBride, Tess M.
    Cameron, Shaharn C.
    Fineran, Peter C.
    Fagerlund, Robert D.
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 480 (07) : 471 - 488
  • [27] Prediction of protein–protein interactions between anti-CRISPR and CRISPR-Cas using machine learning technique
    Sneha Murmu
    Himanshushekhar Chaurasia
    Sayanti Guha Majumdar
    A. R. Rao
    Anil Rai
    Sunil Archak
    Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2023, 32 : 818 - 830
  • [28] DNA targeting by subtype I-D CRISPR-Cas shows type I and type III features
    Lin, Jinzhong
    Fuglsang, Anders
    Kjeldsen, Anders Lynge
    Sun, Kaiyan
    Bhoobalan-Chitty, Yuvaraj
    Peng, Xu
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (18) : 10470 - 10478
  • [29] Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins
    Joseph Bondy-Denomy
    Bianca Garcia
    Scott Strum
    Mingjian Du
    MaryClare F. Rollins
    Yurima Hidalgo-Reyes
    Blake Wiedenheft
    Karen L. Maxwell
    Alan R. Davidson
    Nature, 2015, 526 : 136 - 139
  • [30] Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by anti-CRISPR proteins in diverse bacterial species
    Pawluk, April
    Staals, Raymond H. J.
    Taylor, Corinda
    Watson, Bridget N. J.
    Saha, Senjuti
    Fineran, Peter C.
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    Davidson, Alan R.
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 1 (08)