The importance of validating the diagnosis of coronary heart disease when measuring secondary prevention: a cross-sectional study in general practice

被引:11
|
作者
Connolly, P
Cupples, ME
Cuene-Grandidier, H
Johnston, D
Passmore, P
机构
[1] Dunluce Hlth Ctr, Belfast BT9 7HR, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Gen Practice, Data Retrieval Gen Practice Project, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Therapeut & Pharmacol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Geriatr Med, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
coronary heart disease; secondary prevention; validation of diagnosis;
D O I
10.1002/pds.709
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare levels of recorded risk factors and drug treatment between patients with validated and non-validated diagnoses of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Northern Ireland. Methods Patients with a nitrate prescription in the previous year or a CHD Read code were identified from computer records of 25 practices, stratified by partnership size and area board. Computer and paper records of a random sample of 10% of these were searched for specified criteria to validate the diagnosis of CHD. The diagnosis was considered valid if the patient was found to have one or more positive investigations for CHD. Records of blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, body mass index and drugs prescribed were taken into account. Results The combined practice population was 151071; 7338 (4.86%) were identified by the computer search as meeting the defined entry criteria for CHD. Among the 10% random sample the diagnosis of CHD could not be validated for 36.5% (265/27). Significantly more patients with a validated than non-validated diagnosis had recorded cholesterol levels below 5.0 mmol/l (55.8 vs. 34.5%, p < 0.001) and were prescribed aspirin (75.3 vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001), beta-blockers (51.5 vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (29.2 vs. 15.5%, p < 0.001) and lipid-lowering drugs (50.9 vs. 23.0%, p < 0.001). A recent nitrate prescription had a higher predictive value for validated CHD than a Read code for CHD alone (71.2 vs. 53.1%, p < 0.001). No other significant differences were found between the two group, regarding the extent or levels of recorded risk factors. Conclusions Patients with a validated diagnosis of CHD appear to be better managed than those whose diagnosis has not been confirmed. Validation of diagnosis has important implications for assessing the provision of secondary prevention and for clinical governance. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EXERCISE CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    ASATO, T
    NAITO, M
    TOYAMA, M
    NAGOSHI, H
    HONDA, M
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 1982, 46 (08): : 819 - 820
  • [42] EXERCISE CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    MORGANROTH, J
    CHEN, CC
    DAVID, D
    SAWIN, HS
    NAITO, M
    PARROTTO, C
    MEIXELL, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1981, 47 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [43] Knowledge and practice in cardiovascular disease prevention among hospital registered nurses: a cross-sectional study
    Ding, Shu
    Deng, Ying
    Lu, Sai
    Lamb, Karen, V
    Zhang, Ying
    Wu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (21-22) : 3318 - 3327
  • [44] Computed tomography coronary angiography vs. standard diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of angina due to coronary heart disease: A cross-sectional study
    Wu, Zheng
    He, Yi
    Li, Wenzheng
    Cheng, Shujuan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (04) : 2485 - 2494
  • [45] Variation in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: the INTERASPIRE study
    McEvoy, John William
    Jennings, Catriona
    Kotseva, Kornelia
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    De Backer, Guy
    Erlund, Iris
    Vihervaara, Terhi
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Ray, Kausik K.
    Ryden, Lars
    Abreu, Ana
    Almahmeed, Wael
    Ambari, Ade Meidian
    Ge, Junbo
    Hasan-Ali, Hosam
    Huo, Yong
    Jankowski, Piotr
    Jimenez, Rodney M.
    Li, Yong
    Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi
    Makubi, Abel
    Mbakwem, Amam Chinyere
    Mbau, Lilian
    Estrada, Jose Luis Navarro
    Ogah, Okechukwu Samuel
    Ogola, Elijah Nyainda
    Quintero-Baiz, Adalberto
    Sani, Mahmoud Umar
    Liprandi, Maria Ines Sosa
    Tan, Jack Wei Chieh
    Triana, Miguel Alberto Urina
    Yeo, Tee Joo
    Ganly, Sandra
    Adamska, Agnieszka
    Wood, David
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [46] Cancer Diagnosis in Hypertensive Heart Disease Population: A Cross Sectional Study in Soetomo General Hospital
    Ardiana, Meity
    Widiarti, Wynne
    Multazam, Chaq El Chaq Z.
    Sulistya, Hanif Ardiansyah
    COR ET VASA, 2024, 66 (03) : 318 - 322
  • [47] Occupational exposures and coronary heart disease in the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) – a cross-sectional study
    Franziska Labe
    Raphael Twerenbold
    Betül Toprak
    Peter Koch
    Birgit-Christiane Zyriax
    Sarah Affolderbach
    Lukas Damerau
    Hanno Hoven
    Hajo Zeeb
    Robert Herold
    Volker Harth
    BMC Public Health, 25 (1)
  • [48] CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE IN INFANTS
    MACARTNEY, FJ
    BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1983, 50 (06): : 501 - 505
  • [49] Patient differences related to management in general practice and the hospital: a cross-sectional study of heart failure in the community
    Nielsen, OW
    McDonagh, T
    Cowburn, P
    Blue, L
    Robb, SD
    Dargie, H
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (19) : 1718 - 1725
  • [50] Inflammation and Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Depression in China Mainland: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhou, Lina
    Ma, Xiancang
    Wang, Wei
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 81 - 86