The importance of validating the diagnosis of coronary heart disease when measuring secondary prevention: a cross-sectional study in general practice

被引:11
|
作者
Connolly, P
Cupples, ME
Cuene-Grandidier, H
Johnston, D
Passmore, P
机构
[1] Dunluce Hlth Ctr, Belfast BT9 7HR, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Gen Practice, Data Retrieval Gen Practice Project, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Therapeut & Pharmacol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Geriatr Med, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
coronary heart disease; secondary prevention; validation of diagnosis;
D O I
10.1002/pds.709
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare levels of recorded risk factors and drug treatment between patients with validated and non-validated diagnoses of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Northern Ireland. Methods Patients with a nitrate prescription in the previous year or a CHD Read code were identified from computer records of 25 practices, stratified by partnership size and area board. Computer and paper records of a random sample of 10% of these were searched for specified criteria to validate the diagnosis of CHD. The diagnosis was considered valid if the patient was found to have one or more positive investigations for CHD. Records of blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, body mass index and drugs prescribed were taken into account. Results The combined practice population was 151071; 7338 (4.86%) were identified by the computer search as meeting the defined entry criteria for CHD. Among the 10% random sample the diagnosis of CHD could not be validated for 36.5% (265/27). Significantly more patients with a validated than non-validated diagnosis had recorded cholesterol levels below 5.0 mmol/l (55.8 vs. 34.5%, p < 0.001) and were prescribed aspirin (75.3 vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001), beta-blockers (51.5 vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (29.2 vs. 15.5%, p < 0.001) and lipid-lowering drugs (50.9 vs. 23.0%, p < 0.001). A recent nitrate prescription had a higher predictive value for validated CHD than a Read code for CHD alone (71.2 vs. 53.1%, p < 0.001). No other significant differences were found between the two group, regarding the extent or levels of recorded risk factors. Conclusions Patients with a validated diagnosis of CHD appear to be better managed than those whose diagnosis has not been confirmed. Validation of diagnosis has important implications for assessing the provision of secondary prevention and for clinical governance. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of secondary prevention practice in poststroke and coronary heart disease patients
    Vanek, J.
    Mayer, O., Jr.
    Seidlerova, J.
    Bruthans, J.
    Kielbergerova, L.
    Wohlfahrt, P.
    Krajcoviechova, A.
    Filipovsky, J.
    Cifkova, R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 137 : 64 - 72
  • [32] CORONARY HEART-DISEASE PREVENTION - A GENERAL-PRACTICE CHALLENGE
    FOWLER, G
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS, 1988, 38 (314): : 391 - 392
  • [33] Diagnostic Utility of ANG in Coronary Heart Disease Complicating Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Yu, Peng
    Liu, Ming
    Yang, Xue
    Yu, Ying
    Zhao, Ji
    Zhang, Lei
    Tong, Rui
    Jiang, Hong
    Zou, Yunzeng
    Ge, Junbo
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2016, 2016 : 1 - 6
  • [34] Association between general practice funding and practice achievement: a cross-sectional study
    L'Esperance, Veline S.
    Parkin, David
    Ashworth, Mark
    LANCET, 2016, 388 : 66 - 66
  • [35] Practice pharmacists and their influence on prescribing in UK general practice: a cross-sectional study
    Carter, Mary
    Chapman, Sarah
    Rogers, Philip
    Watson, Margaret
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024, 32 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [36] Multimorbidity and statin prescription for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A cross-sectional study in general practice in France
    Onaisi, Racha
    Dumont, Roxane
    Hasselgard-Rowe, Jennifer
    Safar, David
    Haller, Dagmar M.
    Maisonneuve, Hubert
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 9
  • [37] Presentations to general practice before a cancer diagnosis in Victoria: a cross-sectional survey
    Lacey, Karen
    Bishop, James F.
    Cross, Hannah L.
    Chondros, Patty
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    Emery, Jon D.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 205 (02) : 66 - 71
  • [38] PATIENTS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CORONARY HEART DISEASE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
    Wartak, Siddharth
    Friderici, Jennifer
    Naglieri, Deborah
    Rothberg, Michael
    Verma, Ashish
    Lotfi, Amir
    Hussain, Syed
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 345 - 345
  • [39] Cross-sectional associations of resistin, coronary heart disease, and insulin resistance
    Burnett, MS
    Devaney, JM
    Adenika, RJ
    Lindsay, R
    Howard, BV
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2006, 91 (01): : 64 - 68
  • [40] EXERCISE CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    MORGANROTH, J
    CHEN, CC
    DAVID, D
    SAWIN, HS
    NAITO, M
    PARROTTO, C
    MEIXELL, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1980, 45 (02): : 404 - 404