Endocrine disrupting chemicals research program of the US Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a peer-review report

被引:27
|
作者
Harding, Anna K.
Daston, George P.
Boyd, Glen R.
Lucier, George W.
Safe, Stephen H.
Stewart, Juarine
Tillitt, Donald E.
Van der Kraak, Glen
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] HDR Engn Inc, Bellevue, WA USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Physiol & Pharmacol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] Morgan State Univ, Sch Comp Math & Nat Sci, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Columbia Environm Res Ctr, Biochem & Physiol Branch, Columbia, MO USA
[7] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
ecologic effects; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; endocrine disruptors; hormonal activity; human health; risk assessment; risk management; screening and testing;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.8875
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, a) take a leadership role in the application of "omics" technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1282
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE CIVILIAN EXTERNAL PEER-REVIEW PROGRAM - AN INTERIM-REPORT
    BUCK, AS
    MARTIN, ED
    MAZZUCHI, JF
    MERRY, M
    MENDEZ, E
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 1992, 157 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [32] 1990 UPDATE OF THE US-ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-AGENCY SITE EMERGING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
    SANNING, DE
    LEWIS, NM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1990, 40 (12): : 1706 - 1716
  • [33] Stimulating Innovation Through the Challenges and Prizes Program From the US Environmental Protection Agency
    Drumm, Heather
    Zenni, Wyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 85 (09) : 32 - 33
  • [34] REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-AGENCY RESEARCH IN WASTE TREATMENT FOR WATERCRAFT
    LEDERMAN, PB
    LIBRIZZI, WJ
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1973, 95 (10): : 68 - 69
  • [35] Ecological research in the Office of Research and Development at the US Environmental Protection Agency: An overview of new directions
    Linthurst, RA
    Mulkey, LA
    Slimak, MW
    Veith, GD
    Levinson, BM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (04) : 1222 - 1229
  • [36] FUNDING UK RESEARCH - COMMENT ON THE REPORT TO THE ABRC FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON PEER-REVIEW
    SUGDEN, D
    [J]. AREA, 1991, 23 (04) : 368 - 371
  • [37] Valuing the opportunities of the WFH twinning program for research projects, peer-review publications and academic development
    Lambert, Catherine
    Hermans, Cedric
    Sanogo, Ibrahima
    Lobet, Sebastien
    Meite, N'Dogomo
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2020, 26 : 114 - 115
  • [38] Economic evaluation of the US environmental protection agency's SunWise Program: Sun protection education for young children
    Kyle, Jessica W.
    Hammitt, James K.
    Lim, Henry W.
    Geller, Alan C.
    Hall-Jordan, Luke H.
    Maibach, Edward W.
    De Fabo, Edward C.
    Wagner, Mark C.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (05) : E1074 - E1084
  • [39] Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than 'sound science', should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals
    Trasande, Leonardo
    Vandenberg, Laura N.
    Bourguignon, Jean-Pierre
    Myers, John Peterson
    Slama, Remy
    vom Saal, Frederick
    Zoeller, Robert Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2016, 70 (11) : 1051 - 1056
  • [40] Raising the Bar for Reproducible Science at the US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development
    George, Barbara Jane
    Sobus, Jon R.
    Phelps, Lara P.
    Rashleigh, Brenda
    Simmons, Jane Ellen
    Hines, Ronald N.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 145 (01) : 16 - 22