Endocrine disrupting chemicals research program of the US Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a peer-review report

被引:27
|
作者
Harding, Anna K.
Daston, George P.
Boyd, Glen R.
Lucier, George W.
Safe, Stephen H.
Stewart, Juarine
Tillitt, Donald E.
Van der Kraak, Glen
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] HDR Engn Inc, Bellevue, WA USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Physiol & Pharmacol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] Morgan State Univ, Sch Comp Math & Nat Sci, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Columbia Environm Res Ctr, Biochem & Physiol Branch, Columbia, MO USA
[7] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
ecologic effects; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; endocrine disruptors; hormonal activity; human health; risk assessment; risk management; screening and testing;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.8875
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, a) take a leadership role in the application of "omics" technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1282
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Environmental signaling: What embryos and evolution teach us about endocrine disrupting chemicals
    McLachlan, JA
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2001, 22 (03) : 319 - 341
  • [12] Environmental Contamination and Human Exposure to Select Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: A Review
    Sangeetha, Seethappan
    Vimalkumar, Krishnamoorthi
    Loganathan, Bommanna G.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2021, 2 (02): : 343 - 380
  • [13] Nanotechnology applications and implications research supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grants program
    Savage, Nora
    Thomas, Treye A.
    Duncan, Jeremiah S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2007, 9 (10): : 1046 - 1054
  • [14] The US Environmental Protection Agency particulate matter health effects research centers program:: A midcourse report of status, progress, and plans
    Lippmann, M
    Frampton, M
    Schwartz, J
    Dockery, D
    Schlesinger, R
    Koutrakis, P
    Froines, J
    Nel, A
    Finkelstein, J
    Godleski, J
    Kaufman, J
    Koenig, J
    Larson, T
    Luchtel, D
    Liu, LJS
    Oberdörster, G
    Peters, A
    Sarnat, J
    Sioutas, C
    Suh, H
    Sullivan, J
    Utell, M
    Wichmann, E
    Zelikoff, J
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (08) : 1074 - 1092
  • [15] Slipping through the Cracks: Why is the US Environmental Protection Agency Not Funding Extramural Research on Chemicals in Our Environment?
    Burton, G. Allen, Jr.
    Di Giulio, Richard
    Costello, David
    Rohr, Jason R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (02) : 755 - 756
  • [16] Environmental exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and their role in endometriosis: a systematic literature review
    Sirohi, Diksha
    Al Ramadhani, Ruqaiya
    Knibbs, Luke D.
    [J]. REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 36 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [17] US Environmental Protection Agency: Nanotechnology research directions and initiatives
    McKittrick, Michael
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [18] US Environmental Protection Agency research on drinking water disinfection
    Huggett, RJ
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR WATER USE AND CONSERVATION, 1997, : 83 - 88
  • [19] Environmental Exposure to Non-Persistent Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Endometriosis: A Systematic Review
    Wieczorek, Katarzyna
    Szczesna, Dorota
    Jurewicz, Joanna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [20] A review on environmental distributions and risk management of phenols pertaining to the endocrine disrupting chemicals in Taiwan
    Tsai, Wen-Tien
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 95 (05): : 723 - 736