Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Contrast Sensitivity in C57Bl/6 Mice

被引:43
|
作者
van Alphen, Bart [1 ]
Winkelman, Beerend H. J. [1 ]
Frens, Maarten A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosci, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
EYE-MOVEMENTS; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; OPTOKINETIC RESPONSE; SPATIAL VISION; VISUAL-ACUITY; CEREBELLAR LTD; MOUSE EYE; WILD-TYPE; SYSTEM; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.08-2594
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To measure contrast sensitivity in C57BL/6, the most commonly used mouse in behavioral neuroscience, and to study the effect of sex, age, and miotic drugs on the contrast sensitivity function. In addition, the authors tested a mutant in which plasticity in the cerebellum is impaired by expressing a protein kinase C inhibitor. This inhibitor is also expressed in the retina, possibly affecting vision. METHODS. The gain of the optokinetic reflex (OKR) decreases as stimuli become more difficult to see. Recording OKR gains evoked by moving sine gratings shows whether the stimulus was distinguished from a homogeneous background and how well the stimulus was distinguished. RESULTS. Female mice have lower OKR gains than male mice (both groups: n = 10, P = 0.001). A similar difference was observed between 4-month-old (n = 10) and 9-month-old (n = 5) C57Bl/6 mice (P = 0.001). These differences could not be detected with earlier dichotomic tests. C57BL/6 mice are able to see contrasts as low as 1%, well below the previously reported 5% threshold. Pilocarpine had no significant effect on contrast sensitivity (both groups: n = 10, P = 0.89). Vision in L7-PKCi mutants was unaffected (both groups: n = 10, P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS. OKR gains decrease as stimuli become more difficult to see, making the OKR a powerful tool to quantify contrast sensitivity. In C57BL/6 these response magnitudes vary greatly between sexes and between mice that differ only a few months in age. Therefore, it is important to match groups according to age and sex in experiments that require unimpaired vision. Otherwise, impaired vision can be misinterpreted as a learning or motor problem. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2451-2458) DOI:10.1167/iovs.08-2594
引用
收藏
页码:2451 / 2458
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SEX-DIFFERENCES IN GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN IN DIABETIC AND NONDIABETIC C57BL/6 MICE
    DUBUC, PU
    SCOTT, BK
    PETERSON, CM
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1993, 21 (2-3) : 95 - 101
  • [22] Sex differences in response to nicotine in C57Bl/6:129SvEv mice
    Isiegas, Carolina
    Mague, Stephen D.
    Blendy, Julie A.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (07) : 851 - 858
  • [23] SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE CONSUMPTION OF ETHANOL WITH INTERMITTENT ACCESS IN C57BL/6 J MICE
    Levinson, Sally A.
    Hwa, Lara S.
    DeBold, Joseph F.
    Miczek, Klaus A.
    BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 22 : E25 - E25
  • [24] Sex differences in memory for landmark arrays in C57BL/J6 mice
    Tania J. Bettis
    Lucia F. Jacobs
    Animal Cognition, 2013, 16 : 873 - 882
  • [25] Age- and gender-specific changes of hypocretin immunopositive neurons in C57Bl/6 mice
    Brownell, Sara E.
    Conti, Bruno
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2010, 472 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [26] A comparison of the behavior of C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 mice
    Deacon, R. M. J.
    Thomas, C. L.
    Rawlins, J. N. P.
    Morley, B. J.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (02) : 239 - 247
  • [27] GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON C57BL/6 MICE
    MIDDAUGH, LD
    FRACKELTON, WF
    BOGGAN, WO
    ONOFRIO, A
    SHEPHERD, CL
    ALCOHOL, 1992, 9 (03) : 257 - 260
  • [28] Differences in anxiety-related behavior between apolipoprotein E-deficient C57BL/6 and wild type C57BL/6 mice
    McLachlan, CS
    Soh, CYX
    PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 54 (06) : 701 - 704
  • [29] Behavioral and neuroreceptor differences in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice
    G. I. Kovalev
    E. A. Kondrakhin
    R. M. Salimov
    Neurochemical Journal, 2013, 7 : 121 - 127
  • [30] Behavioral and neuroreceptor differences in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice
    Kovalev, G. I.
    Kondrakhin, E. A.
    Salimov, R. M.
    NEUROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (02) : 121 - 127